Comparing Two Methods of Delivering Neuropsychological Feedback
Comparing Two Methods of Delivering Neuropsychological Feedback
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/arclin/acs142
复制
发表时间：
2013-03-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Hilsabeck, Robin C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fallows, Robert R.;Hilsabeck, Robin C.
反馈方法已经在医学和心理治疗环境中进行了研究，但在神经心理学中的研究有限。本研究的目的是检查是否补充口头反馈与书面信息将导致更多的保留信息和改善遵守建议。72名退伍军人参加了这项研究，并随机接受口头反馈或口头反馈与书面信息。然后，参与者在反馈后立即接受采访，并在1个月后通过电话进行采访。单变量分析显示，书面组自由地回忆更多的建议，在电话采访，但是，没有差异的回忆诊断信息或建议尝试的数量。研究结果表明，接收补充书面信息，提高回忆的建议，病人更喜欢收到书面信息，除了口头反馈。建议，以提高反馈信息的保留进行了讨论。
Feedback methods have been studied in medical and psychotherapy settings, but limited research is available in neuropsychology. The purpose of this study was to examine whether supplementing oral feedback with written information would lead to greater retention of information and improved adherence to recommendations. Seventy-two veterans were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive oral feedback only or oral feedback with written information. The participants were then interviewed immediately after feedback and 1 month later by phone. Univariate analyses revealed that the written group freely recalled more recommendations at the phone interview; however, there were no differences in recall of diagnostic information or the number of recommendations attempted. Findings indicate that receiving supplemental written information improves recall of recommendations and that patients prefer to receive written information in addition to oral feedback. Recommendations to improve the retention of feedback information are discussed.