When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings
When do subgroup parts add up to the stereotypic whole? Mixed stereotype content for gay male subgroups explains overall ratings
复制标题
DOI：
10.1521/soco.23.2.161.65626
复制
发表时间：
2005-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Clausell, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Clausell, E
男同性恋者在刻板印象内容模型（SCM; Fiske等人，2002）外群地图，矛盾的有据可查的偏见，但可能掩盖不同的亚群。亚组分析测试SCM的下级水平，概括超越宏观社会群体在多元文化的社会。分析还测试亚组作为同性恋者的诊断，调查他们的有意义的分化。预测试确定了10个不同的小组，然后大学生对SCM维度的“温暖”和“能力”进行评分。“正如预测的那样，（a）出现了三个集群;（B）混合定型观念内容占主导地位;（c）没有高-高分组，但（d）有两个低-低分组。感知到的地位和能力相关，尽管出乎意料的不是竞争和温暖。“女性”和“男性”亚组复制了传统妇女和男子的供应链管理地点。SCM显然概括和区分男同性恋群体。
Gay men appear neutral in Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske et al., 2002) outgroup maps, contradicting well-documented prejudice but perhaps masking disparate subgroups. Subgroup analyses test SCM on subordinate levels, generalizing beyond macro social groups in multicultural societies. Analyses also test subgroups as diagnostic for gays, investigating their meaningful differentiation. Pretests identified 10 distinct subgroups which undergraduates then rated on SCM dimensions 'warmth" and "competence." As predicted, (a) three clusters emerge; (b) mixed stereotype content predominates; and (c) no subgroups are high-high, but (d) two are low-low. Perceived status and competence correlate, although unexpectedly not competition and warmth. "Feminine" and "masculine" subgroups replicate SCM locations for traditional women and men. SCM apparently generalizes and differentiates gay male subgroups.