Too Much of a Good Thing? Physician Practices and Patient Willingness for Less Frequent Pap Test Screening Intervals

Too Much of a Good Thing? Physician Practices and Patient Willingness for Less Frequent Pap Test Screening Intervals
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181ca4015
复制
发表时间:
2010-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Coughlin, Steven S.
Coughlin, Steven S.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Meissner, Helen I.;Tiro, Jasmin A.;Coughlin, Steven S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:最近的指南建议更长的巴氏试验间隔。然而,医生和患者可能不会采用这些recommendations.Objectives:识别(1)医生和实践的特点与建议较低频率的间隔,和(2)与妇女的意愿,坚持3年的间隔相关的特点。研究设计:我们使用了2个国家的调查:(1)2006/2007年全国初级保健医生宫颈癌筛查情况调查(N = 1114),以及(2)2005年健康信息趋势调查,了解妇女接受较长巴氏检查间隔的情况(N = 2206).测量和方法:使用临床小插曲测量关于巴氏检查间隔的医生建议,所述临床小插曲涉及35岁的无新性伴侣和连续3次阴性巴氏检查的患者;与自变量的关联用逻辑回归进行评估。在平行模型中,我们评估了妇女愿意遵循3年巴氏试验intervention.Results:少数医生(32%)采用,但超过一半的妇女愿意采用3年巴氏试验间隔。在调整后的模型中,与筛查频率较低相关的医生因素是:服务于较高比例的医疗补助患者,白色,非西班牙裔种族,医学院毕业后的年数较少,以及美国预防服务工作组在医生临床实践中非常有影响力。妇女更愿意遵循3年的间隔,如果他们是老年人,但不太愿意,如果他们有个人或家庭的经验,癌症或遵循每年巴氏试验schedule.Conclusions:许多妇女接受3年的间隔巴氏试验,虽然大多数初级保健医生继续建议较短的间隔。
Background: Recent guidelines recommend longer Pap test intervals. However, physicians and patients may not be adopting these recommendations.Objectives: Identify (1) physician and practice characteristics associated with recommending a less frequent interval, and (2) characteristics associated with women's willingness to adhere to a 3-year interval.Research Design: We used 2 national surveys: (1) a 2006/2007 National Survey of Primary Care Physicians for physician cervical cancer screening practices (N = 1114), and (2) the 2005 Health Information Trends Survey for women's acceptance of longer Pap intervals (N = 2206).Measures and Methods: Physician recommendation regarding Pap intervals was measured using a clinical vignette involving a 35-year-old with no new sexual partners and 3 consecutive negative Pap tests; associations with independent variables were evaluated with logistic regression. In parallel models, we evaluated women's willingness to follow a 3-year Pap test interval.Results: A minority of physicians (32%) have adopted-but more than half of women are willing to adopt-3-year Pap test intervals. In adjusted models, physician factors associated with less frequent screening were: serving a higher proportion of Medicaid patients, white, non-Hispanic race, fewer years since medical school graduation, and US Preventive Services Task Force being very influential in physician clinical practice. Women were more willing to follow a 3-year interval if they were older, but less willing if they had personal or family experiences with cancer or followed an annual Pap test schedule.Conclusions: Many women are accepting of a 3-year interval for Pap tests, although most primary care physicians continue to recommend shorter intervals.