Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory.

Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory.
复制标题

记忆过程分离方法的一些问题。

DOI:
10.1037//0096-3445.125.2.181
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. General.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Johnson,MK
Johnson,MK
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dodson,CS;Johnson,MK

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

过程分离框架(LL Escherby,参见记录1992-07943-001)是一种用于对控制(例如回忆)和自动(例如熟悉)记忆过程进行估计的技术。作者研究了这个框架的三个假设。在实验1中,熟悉的估计受到影响,通过不同的比例,老目标,老nontargets上的包容和排除测试,无论测试完成了充分或分散注意力,违反了假设,熟悉的影响是自动的。在实验2中,旧的目标和旧的非目标的相似性被操纵,以表明源混淆(即,回忆错误)违反了假设的回忆过程是全有或全无。来源混淆也会造成回忆对包含和排除测试影响的不平衡,违反了一致性假设。来源监测框架与目前的调查结果是一致的。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2016阿帕,保留所有权利)
The process-dissociation framework (LL Jacoby, see record 1992-07943-001) is a technique for deriving estimates of controlled (eg, recollection) and automatic (eg, familiarity) memory processes. The authors examined 3 assumptions of this framework. In Experiment 1, estimates of familiarity were affected by varying the proportion of old targets to old nontargets on the inclusion and exclusion tests and whether or not the tests were completed with full or divided attention, violating the assumption that familiarity's influence is automatic. In Experiment 2, the similarity of old targets and old nontargets was manipulated to show that source confusions (ie, misrecollections) violate the assumption that the process of recollection is all-or-none. Source confusions also create an imbalance in the influence of recollection on the inclusion and exclusion tests, violating the consistency assumption. The source-monitoring framework is consistent with the present findings.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)