Using face validity to recognize empirical community observations
Using face validity to recognize empirical community observations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.08.001
复制
发表时间：
2010-05-01
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Gaber, Sharon L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gaber, John;Gaber, Sharon L.
国际规划学者越来越有兴趣通过定性研究方法探索社区参与规划过程。在本文中，研究评估工具“表面有效性”被讨论为帮助规划者破译社区何时共享基于经验的观察结果的一种方法，这些观察结果可以提高规划制定过程的适用性。表面效度提供了对研究结论的常识评估。它允许评估者审视整个研究项目并询问：“从表面上看，这项研究有意义吗？”规划者倾听公民的评论并注意表面有效性观察，为政府提供了向社区进行实证学习的机会，看看他们是否“做对了”。如果没有，就制定一个课程来指导他们如何做对。 (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. 保留所有权利。
There is a growing interest among international planning scholars to explore community participation in the plan making process from a qualitative research approach. In this paper the research assessment tool "face validity" is discussed as one way to help planners decipher when the community is sharing empirically grounded observations that can advance the applicability of the plan making process. Face validity provides a common sense assessment of research conclusions. It allows the assessor to look at an entire research project and ask: "on the face of things, does this research make sense?" With planners listening to citizen comments with an ear for face validity observations, holds open the opportunity for government to empirically learn from the community to see if they "got it right." And if not, to chart out a course on how they can get it right. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.