Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling
Transportation-land-use interaction: empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s1361-9209(99)00036-x
复制
发表时间：
2000-07-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Miller, EJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Badoe, DA;Miller, EJ
过去二十年，针对汽车拥有和使用问题，实施了各种基于土地使用的政策。然而，此类政策的有效性存在问题。因此，本文回顾了交通-土地利用相互作用的实证研究文献，目的是确定有关相互作用的知识现状，特别是土地利用政策可能对系统产生的影响。重点是在北美进行的研究。结果好坏参半；一些研究得出结论，城市密度、传统社区设计方案和土地利用组合对汽车拥有和使用有影响，其他研究发现这些变量的影响最多是边际的。我们对相互作用的理解存在差距，发现这些差距主要是数据限制和方法学缺陷造成的。详细讨论了研究结果对综合交通-土地利用模型的开发和应用的影响，并建议如果没有这种综合方法来分析交通-土地利用相互作用，任何关于城市形态对出行行为影响的研究都可能会产生错误的结果，(C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd。保留所有权利。
The last two decades have witnessed the implementation of various policies based on land-use to address problems stemming from automobile ownership and use. There are, however, questions with respect to the efficacy of such policies, This paper therefore reviews the literature on empirical studies of the transportation-land-use interaction with the objective of identifying the current state of knowledge concerning the interactions, particularly with respect to the impact land-use policies are likely to have on the system. The focus is on studies conducted in North America. The results are mixed; some studies conclude that urban densities, traditional neighborhood design schemes, and land-use mix have an impact on auto ownership and use, Other studies find the impact of such variables to be at best marginal. Gaps in our understanding of the interaction are identified, These are found to be primarily the result of data limitations and methodological weaknesses. A detailed discussion of the implications of the findings for the development and application of integrated transportation-land-use models is provided, with the recommendation that without such an integrated approach to analyzing the transportation-land-use interaction, any study of impacts of urban form on travel behavior is likely to yield erroneous results, (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.