Development and initial validation of validity scales for the NEO-Five Factor Inventory

Development and initial validation of validity scales for the NEO-Five Factor Inventory
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00262-7
复制
发表时间:
2000-12-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Scandell, DJ
Scandell, DJ
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scandell, DJ

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

基于辛卡(Schinka)、金德(Kinder)和克雷默(Kremer)所建立的方法(辛卡,J.A.,金德,B.N.,&克雷默,T.(1997年)。《NEO - PI - R的研究效度量表:编制与初步验证》,《人格评估杂志》,68卷,127 - 138页),为NEO五因素量表(NEO - FFI,科斯塔,P.T.,&麦克雷,R.R.(1992年)。《修订版NEO人格量表和NEO五因素量表专业手册》,佛罗里达州敖德萨:心理评估资源公司)编制了一套效度量表。在研究1中,111名本科生完成了NEO - FFI,利用项目均值、标准差和相关系数构建了积极印象管理、消极印象管理和不一致反应的测量指标。在研究2中,146名参与者在五种指令组(控制组、装好组、装坏组、研究生心理学组和警校招生组)中的一组指令下完成了NEO - FFI。一组随机生成的NEO - FFI剖面图被添加到此数据集中。方差分析结果支持了效度量表的实用性,因为它们对随机反应、积极和消极印象管理的敏感程度符合假设的方式。(C)2000年爱思唯尔科学有限公司。保留所有权利。
Based upon the methodology established by Schinka, Kinder, and Kremer (Schinka, J. A., Kinder, B. N., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 127-138), a set of validity scales were developed for the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI, Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five Factor Inventory Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources). In Study 1, 111 undergraduates completed the NEO-FFI and item means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations were used to construct measures of Positive Impression Management, Negative Impression Management, and Inconsistent Responding. In Study 2, 146 participants completed the NEO-FFI under one of five instructional sets (control, fake good, fake bad, graduate psychology and police academy admissions). A set of randomly produced NEO-FFI profiles were added to this data set. ANOVA results provided support for the utility of the validity scales, as they were differentially sensitive to random responding, positive and negative impression management in hypothesized ways. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.