The Role of Prophylactic Postoperative Steroids in Pediatric Cardiac Operations.
The Role of Prophylactic Postoperative Steroids in Pediatric Cardiac Operations.
复制标题
预防性术后类固醇在小儿心脏手术中的作用。
DOI:
10.1097/pcc.0000000000000465
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Graham,EricM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Graham,EricM
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is known to incite an inflammatory cascade that is believed to contribute to postoperative morbidity. As a result, the empiric use of steroids as prophylactic anti-inflammatory therapy has become a common practice in pediatric cardiac surgery. Most of the early work investigating steroids and pediatric cardiac surgery revolved around steroid administration preoperatively and/or at the induction of anesthesia or in the CPB prime. In the early 2000s, several small pediatric randomized controlled trials of varying type, dose, and timing of preoperative steroids demonstrated a reduction in inflammatory markers albeit with variable improvement in hemodynamic variables or clinical outcomes (1, 2). More recently, the literature has given way to larger trials (3, 4), meta-analysis (5), and large observational studies (6, 7) that suggest no benefit with prophylactic steroids and possibly an association with increased morbidity particularly in lower surgical risk groups. As such, the utility of preemptive preoperative and intraoperative steroids in pediatric cardiac operations remains highly debated (8). By contrast, there is a paucity of literature that has explored the risks and benefits of steroids in the postoperative period. In the majority of these studies, steroids were administered selectively to surgical (and sometimes nonsurgical) patients with catecholamine-resistant hypotension (9–11). These studies suggest an improvement in hemodynamics and a reduction in inotropic requirements when compared with the time preceding selective steroid administration. Although encouraging, study limitations hinder their generalizability. In this issue of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Robert et al (12) performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial of postoperative hydrocortisone versus placebo in infants undergoing cardiac operations with CPB to determine if prophylactic hydrocortisone could decrease the prevalence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS). The main findings of the study are that a prophylactic continuous 5-day infusion of hydrocortisone reduced the prevalence of LCOS, improved fluid balance and urine output, and attenuates inflammation after CPB compared with placebo. The strengths of this study include an experimental design that was thoughtfully conceived and was well executed. In addition, it is the largest contemporary randomized controlled trial to evaluate postoperative steroids in pediatric cardiac surgery. In fact, there are only two other pediatric randomized controlled trials specifically examining postoperative steroids (13, 14). Four decades ago, Toledo-Pereyra et al (13) performed a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 95 children undergoing CPB. Patients were randomized to six doses of methylprednisolone (30 mg/kg/dose) or placebo beginning 1 hour preoperatively and continuing every 6 hours for 24 hours postoperatively. In contrast to the current study, they found no difference between groups in any hemodynamic variables measured. The authors did, however, observe an improved hospital survival in the steroid group that they found difficult to explain given no other differences between groups. More recently, Ando et al (14) randomized 20 neonates undergoing biventricular repair to a postoperative 7-day continuous hydrocortisone infusion or placebo to determine if adrenal insufficiency exists after CPB. As such, it was not powered to detect clinical outcomes, but similar to the current study they found that steroid treatment was associated with an improved fluid balance and urine output but was not associated with other important clinical outcomes. Consistent with these findings, a recent meta-analysis (15 …