Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment
Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment
复制标题
决策和政策制定的理性：对战略环境评估的影响
DOI：
10.3152/147154600781767402
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
W. Thissen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Kørnøv;W. Thissen
将战略环境评估 (SEA) 正确纳入政策制定流程被认为对于 SEA 的成功至关重要。 SEA的大部分工作似乎都是基于这样的假设：提供理性信息将有助于改善决策，但文献指出了真实决策过程的其他特征，包括认知限制、行为偏差、偏好和规范的模糊性和可变性、决策在参与者和时间上的分配，以及决策作为多个参与者之间的学习和谈判过程的概念。所有这些都与规划和政策层面非常相关。在政策科学文献中，一些方法也可能对战略环境评估有希望，例如支持开放的学习过程、支持方式的多样性以及在这些过程中发挥的作用，以及更加关注参与者的配置和利益分配，作为寻找可实施和有效的政策问题解决方案的基础。这些想法的阐述对于 SEA 既带来了希望，也带来了挑战。
A proper integration of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) into policy-making processes is considered critical to the success of SEA. Most of the work in SEA seems to be based on the assumption that the provision of rational information will help improve decision-making, but the literature points to other characteristics of real decision-making processes, including cognitive limitations, behavioural biases, ambiguity and variability of preferences and norms, distribution of decision-making over actors and in time, and the notion of decision-making as a process of learning and negotiation between multiple actors. All these are very relevant at the planning and policy level. In the policy sciences literature, some approaches may also hold promise for SEA, such as supporting an open learning process, variety in ways to support and roles to play in these processes, and paying more attention to the actor configuration and distribution of interests, as a basis for finding implementable and effective solutions to policy problems. The elaboration of these ideas holds promises as well as challenges for SEA.