Public Attitudes to Gaelic and the Debate about Scottish Autonomy
Public Attitudes to Gaelic and the Debate about Scottish Autonomy
复制标题
公众对盖尔语的态度和有关苏格兰自治的争论
DOI：
10.1080/13597566.2013.877449
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Paterson L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Paterson L
苏格兰似乎是语言与民族认同或民族主义之间关系的一般理论的反例。这些理论指出，语言与民族的意识形态有三个组成部分：会说国语是正式的民族成员资格的必要条件;国语是民族文化的核心部分;民族政治自治的未来与国语的未来是相互联系的。在苏格兰，语言似乎不是民族成员或文化的核心，语言运动也不是自治政治运动的核心。本文提出了新的证据，从2012年苏格兰社会态度调查，质疑这些信念之间的关系，语言和民族认同或民族主义在苏格兰。
Scotland seems to be a counter-example to general theories of the relationship between language and national identity or nationalism. These theories point to three components in the ideology of language and nation—that being able to speak the national language is necessary for full national membership, that the national language is a core part of the nation's culture, and that the future of national political autonomy and the future of the national language are connected with each other. In Scotland, it has appeared that language is not central to national membership or culture, and language campaigning has not been central to the political campaigns for autonomy. The article presents new evidence, from the 2012 Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, which questions these beliefs about the relationship between language and national identity or nationalism in Scotland.