The g-ocentric View of Intelligence and Job Performance Is Wrong
The g-ocentric View of Intelligence and Job Performance Is Wrong
复制标题
以全球为中心的智力和工作绩效观点是错误的
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Wagner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Sternberg;R. Wagner
Ree 和 Earles 在他们的文章中总结了大量关于 g（一般智力）在预测工作绩效方面的功效的研究文献，无论是在培训阶段还是在将工作知识和技能应用于实际工作绩效方面。在引用的每个案例中，g 相关性从范围受限样本中的 0.33 到更一般的求职者群体样本中的 0.76。非 g 能力对 g 的预测几乎没有增加。对一般智力与工作绩效之间联系的批评者在一篇文章和随后的几条评论中表达了他们的反对意见和反驳意见。
In their article, Ree and Earles summarized a vast research literature on the efficacy of g, or general intelli gence, in predicting job performance, both in training phases and in application of job knowledge and skills to actual job performance. In every case cited, g correlated from .33 in range-restricted samples to .76 in more general population samples of job applicants. Non-g aptitudes added little to the prediction from g. Critics of the connection between general intelligence and job performance voice their objections and counterpoints in an article and several comments that follow.