ACUTE EFFECTS OF STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING ON MUSCLE POWER IN WOMEN
ACUTE EFFECTS OF STATIC, DYNAMIC, AND PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION STRETCHING ON MUSCLE POWER IN WOMEN
复制标题
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0b013e31817b0433
复制
发表时间：
2008-09-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Miller, Todd A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Manoel, Mateus E.;Harris-Love, Michael O.;Miller, Todd A.
Manoel，ME，Harris-Love，MO，Danoff，JV和米勒，TA。静态、动态和本体感觉神经肌肉易化拉伸对女性肌肉力量的急性影响。J Strength Cond Res 22（5）：1528 - 1534，2008-本研究的目的是调查3种类型的拉伸-静态，动态和本体感觉神经肌肉促进（PNF）-对女性峰值肌肉功率输出的急性影响。在60 ° s（-1）和180 ° s（-1）等速测试12名健康和娱乐活跃的女性（平均年龄+/-SD，24 +/-3.3岁）的同心膝关节伸展功率。在3种不同拉伸方案和不进行拉伸的对照条件中的每一种之前和之后进行测试。在4次单独的实验室访视期间，每例受试者在进行对照条件、静态拉伸方案、动态拉伸方案或PNF方案之前，以50 W进行5分钟的静止循环。在每个测试速度下，在3次最大膝关节伸展之前进行3次次最大热身试验。在每个速度下的测试之间允许2分钟的休息。统计分析的结果表明，没有一个拉伸协议导致膝关节伸展功率下降。在两种测试速度下，动态拉伸产生的峰值膝关节伸展功率百分比增加（60 ° s（-1）时为8.9%，180 ° s（-1）时为6.3%）大于静态和PNF拉伸后的功率变化。研究结果表明，动态拉伸可能会增加急性肌肉力量在更大程度上比静态和PNF拉伸。这些发现可能对参加依赖高水平肌肉力量的项目的运动员有重要意义。
Manoel, ME, Harris-Love, MO, Danoff, JV, and Miller, TA. Acute effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on muscle power in women. J Strength Cond Res 22(5): 1528-1534, 2008-The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of 3 types of stretching-static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF)- on peak muscle power output in women. Concentric knee extension power was measured isokinetically at 60 degrees.s(-1) and 180 degrees.s(-1) in 12 healthy and recreationally active women (mean age +/- SD, 24 +/- 3.3 years). Testing occurred before and after each of 3 different stretching protocols and a control condition in which no stretching was performed. During 4 separate laboratory visits, each subject performed 5 minutes of stationary cycling at 50 W before performing the control condition, static stretching protocol, dynamic stretching protocol, or PNF protocol. Three submaximal warm-up trials preceded 3 maximal knee extensions at each testing velocity. A 2-minute rest was allowed between testing at each velocity. The results of the statistical analysis indicated that none of the stretching protocols caused a decrease in knee extension power. Dynamic stretching produced percentage increases (8.9% at 60 degrees.s(-1) and 6.3% at 180 degrees.s(-1)) in peak knee extension power at both testing velocities that were greater than changes in power after static and PNF stretching. The findings suggest that dynamic stretching may increase acute muscular power to a greater degree than static and PNF stretching. These findings may have important implications for athletes who participate in events that rely on a high level of muscular power.