Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions
Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0266462301107026
复制
发表时间：
2001-09-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Ciliska, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dobbins, M;Cockerill, R;Ciliska, D
目的：要确定在何种程度上影响公共卫生干预措施的系统评价公共卫生决策和哪些因素与影响这些decisions.Methods：本横断面随访调查评估了使用五个系统评价在公共卫生决策。自变量包括创新特征、组织特征、环境特征和个体特征。主要数据收集使用电话调查和自我管理的组织人口统计学问卷。公共卫生决策者在所有41个公共卫生单位在安大略被邀请参加了这项研究，多元线性回归分析的五个程序decisions carried out.Results：的系统评价被认为是有最大的金额的影响有关的计划理由和计划规划的决策，和最小的影响程序评估决策。更大的看法，一个组织重视使用的研究证据的决策和正在进行的培训，在研究文献的批判性评价提供，更大的感知的影响，系统评价对公共卫生decisions.Conclusions：组织特征是重要的预测系统评价在公共卫生决策中的使用。未来的传播策略需要促进使用系统评价的价值，为计划决策，以及促进正在进行的培训，在关键的评价之间的预期用户在安大略。
Objective: To determine the extent to which systematic reviews of public health interventions influenced public health decisions and which factors were associated with influencing these decisions.Methods: This cross-sectional follow-up survey evaluated the use of five systematic reviews in public health decision making. Independent variables included characteristics of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual. Primary data were collected using a telephone survey and a self-administered organizational demographics questionnaire. Public health decision makers in all 41 public health units in Ontario were invited to participate in the study, Multiple linear regression analyses on the five program decisions were conducted.Results:The systematic reviews were perceived as having the greatest amount of influence on decisions related to program justification and program planning, and the least influence on program evaluation decisions. The greater the perception that one's organization valued the use of research evidence for decision making and that ongoing training in the critical appraisal of research literature was provided, the greater the perception of the influence the systematic review had on public health decisions.Conclusions: Organizational characteristics are important predictors of the use of systematic reviews in public health decision making. Future dissemination strategies need to promote the value of using systematic reviews for program decision making as well as promote ongoing training in critical appraisal among intended users in Ontario.