WHERE DID I GO WRONG - A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ERROR-DETECTION
WHERE DID I GO WRONG - A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ERROR-DETECTION
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.21.6.1312
复制
发表时间：
1995-12-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
COLES, MGH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BERNSTEIN, PS;SCHEFFERS, MK;COLES, MGH
事件相关脑电位中有一个成分，即错误相关负波(ERN)，与选择反应时任务中的错误检测有关。J.Miller(1982)范式被用来确定ERN所表现的检测过程是否涉及实际反应和正确反应的表征之间的比较，或者被试预期的刺激和实际发生的刺激的表征之间的比较。数据倾向于前一种而不是后一种比较，误差信号的大小取决于两种反应表征之间的相似或不同。反过来，反应的相似性取决于。在被试用来选择回答的策略中：首先选择的回答参数定义了哪些回答最相似。
There is a component of the event-related brain potential, the error-related negativity (or ERN), that is related to error detection in choice reaction time tasks. The J. Miller (1982) paradigm was used to determine whether the detection process manifested by the ERN involves a comparison between representations of the actual response and the correct response or between representations of the stimulus anticipated by the subject and the stimulus that actually occurs. The data favored the former rather than the latter kind of comparison, with the magnitude of the error signal depending on the similarity or dissimilarity between the two response representations. In turn, response similarity depended. In the strategy used by the subjects to select responses: Response parameters selected first defined which responses would be most similar.