Mothering versus fathering versus parenting: Measurement equivalence in Parenting measures
Mothering versus fathering versus parenting: Measurement equivalence in Parenting measures
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15295190701498686
复制
发表时间：
2007-07-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Buehler, Cheryl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adamsons, Kari;Buehler, Cheryl
Objective.三个常用的养育结构（接受，心理侵扰，和苛刻）的测量等效性进行了检查，在母亲和父亲。设计832已婚个体（416母亲和416父亲）的样本被用来测试七种类型的等价性为每个措施：结构，度量，标量，独特的方差，因子方差，因子均值和功能。结果验收证明了结构、因子均值和功能等效，但未证明度量、标量、唯一方差或因子方差等效。心理侵入性在所有水平上表现出等价性，除了唯一方差等价性。父母的严厉表现出在所有水平的等效性，除了因素方差等效。结论在对父母教养及其对儿童发展的影响得出实质性结论之前，应进行测量等效性的调查。
Objective. The measurement equivalence of three commonly used parenting constructs (acceptance, psychological intrusiveness, and harshness) was examined across mothers and fathers. Design. A sample of 832 married individuals (416 mothers and 416 fathers) was used to test seven types of equivalence for each measure: configural, metric, scalar, unique variance, factor variance, factor mean, and functional. Results. Acceptance demonstrated configural, factor mean, and functional equivalence but not metric, scalar, unique variance, or factor variance equivalence. Psychological intrusiveness demonstrated equivalence at all levels except unique variance equivalence. Parental harshness demonstrated equivalence at all levels except factor variance equivalence. Conclusion. Investigations of measurement equivalence should be conducted before drawing substantive conclusions regarding mothering and fathering and their effects on children's development.