STABLE HUMAN STANDING WITH LOWER-LIMB MUSCLE AFFERENTS PROVIDING THE ONLY SENSORY INPUT
STABLE HUMAN STANDING WITH LOWER-LIMB MUSCLE AFFERENTS PROVIDING THE ONLY SENSORY INPUT
复制标题
DOI:
10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020369
复制
发表时间:
1994-10-15
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
MCCLOSKEY, DI
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
FITZPATRICK, R;ROGERS, DK;MCCLOSKEY, DI
1. This study investigated the sources of sensory information upon which normal subjects' ability to stand depends.2. An 'equivalent body' was used to simulate the physical properties of each subject's body during standing. The modulation of ankle torque required to support the equivalent body in an upright position was similar to that required to support the subject's own body when standing. However, when balancing the equivalent body, vestibular inputs were excluded from directing the appropriate changes in ankle torque. Thus, stability of stance could be studied with (normal stance) and without (balancing equivalent body) modulation by vestibular inputs. Vision could be excluded by closing the eyes. Sensory input from the feet and ankles could be removed by local anaesthesia from prolonged ischaemia, induced by occluding blood flow with inflated pneumatic cuffs just above the ankles. With vestibular, visual and peripheral sensory inputs negated, standing could rely only upon remaining sensory inputs, notably those from sensory receptors in the leg muscles.3. Unlike the human body, the equivalent body used to negate vestibular inputs is not segmented. Therefore, the effects on stability of having a segmented body were determined by splinting subjects during standing so that only ankle movement was possible. This was done in the presence and absence of visual stabilization.4. For each experimental task, either standing or balancing the equivalent body, sway was recorded while posture was unperturbed. Root mean square values of sway amplitude and power spectra were used to compare conditions.5. Every subject could balance the equivalent body in a stable way when the eyes were closed, and when the feet were anaesthetized. Therefore, they could perform a task that was equivalent to standing but when only sensory information from the leg muscles was available to detect the sway. However, although subjects were stable, sway was greater than when they were standing normally with all sensory inputs available.6. In all situations, sway increased significantly when the eyes were shut, or when splinting prevented the movement of body segments above the ankles. In contrast, there was a small increase in sway when sensory inputs from the feet and ankles were excluded. Sway was similar for standing with the body splinted (vestibular inputs available) and for balancing the equivalent body (vestibular inputs excluded).7. It is concluded that, for normal subjects: (i) proprioceptive signals from receptors in the leg muscles are sufficient to maintain a stable upright stance; (ii) visual inputs are necessary for maximal stability; (iii) the effect of the segmented body is to significantly improve stability; (iv) sensory information from the feet and ankles has a smaller but significant effect on stability; and (v) during normal standing, vestibular inputs are not responsible for modulating activity in the leg muscles to assist stability.