Reconciling RDoC and DSM approaches in clinical psychophysiology and neuroscience.
Reconciling RDoC and DSM approaches in clinical psychophysiology and neuroscience.
复制标题
协调临床心理生理学和神经科学中的 RDoC 和 DSM 方法。
DOI：
10.1111/psyp.12602
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
McTeague,LisaM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McTeague,LisaM
研究领域标准（RDoC）倡议致力于促进基于脑行为关系维度的精神病理学科学，而不是基于主观的诊断类别。跨诊断共性的快速积累，在多个客观和主观的措施，强调了这一举措的明显潜力。与此同时，需要一个指导未来RDoC研究工作的路线图，该路线图借鉴了大量现存的疾病特异性发现。在这个问题上，哈姆和他的同事提供了一个例子，概念化内紊乱过程中的维度脑行为关系，超越传统的疾病分类框架，推进了对惊恐障碍与广场恐怖症的理解。他们的研究结果和概念模型进行审查和讨论，在更广泛的transdiagnosis的影响。
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative endeavors to foster a science of psychopathology based around dimensions of brain‐behavior relationships as opposed to subjectively based diagnostic categories. A rapidly accumulating array of transdiagnostic commonalities, across multiple objective and subjective measures, underscores the clear potential of this initiative. At the same time, a road map for guiding future RDoC research efforts is needed that draws upon the wealth of extant disorder‐specific findings. In this issue, Hamm and colleagues provide an example of conceptualizing within‐disorder processes in terms of dimensional brain‐behavior relationships that advances the understanding of panic disorder with agoraphobia beyond the conventional nosological framework. Their findings and conceptual model are reviewed and discussed in terms of broader transdiagnostic implications.