The PPVT-R as a measure of psycholinguistic functioning: a caution.
The PPVT-R as a measure of psycholinguistic functioning: a caution.
复制标题
PPVT-R 作为心理语言功能的衡量标准：警告。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
T. Altepeter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Altepeter
本调查是为了评估使用PPVT-R作为衡量心理语言功能。样本包括75名学龄儿童提交评估。平均PPVT-R标准评分（94.59，SD = 15.85）与WISC-R全量表IQ（95.36，SD = 16.29）、言语IQ（94.36，SD = 16.17）或操作IQ（97.75，SD = 15.61）或平均ITPA PLQ无显著差异（p <0.01）。PPVT-R与WISC-R全量表智商（.77）、言语智商（.71）和操作智商（.74）以及WISC-R子测验呈显著正相关，相关系数从.42（物体组装）到.69（词汇）不等。此外，PPVT-R与ITPA心理语言商数（PLQ）（.72）和ITPA）子测试呈显著正相关，系数范围从.38（听觉顺序记忆）到.72（语法闭合）。回归分析确定ITPA PLQ和PPVT-R标准评分不能相互预测。这些数据的解释表明，PPVT-R是不是更适合作为一个衡量接受语言能力比作为一个屏幕的智力功能。
The present investigation was undertaken to evaluate the use of the PPVT-R as a measure of psycholinguistic functioning. The sample included 75 school-aged children referred for evaluation. The mean PPVT-R standard score (94.59, SD = 15.85) was not significantly different (p less than .01) than the WISC-R Full Scale IQ (95.36, SD = 16.29), Verbal IQ (94.36, SD = 16.17), or Performance IQ (97.75, SD = 15.61), or the mean ITPA PLQ. The PPVT-R correlated positively and significantly with the WISC-R Full Scale IQ (.77), Verbal IQ (.71) and Performance IQ (.74) and the WISC-R subtests, with coefficients that ranged from .42 (object assembly) to .69 (vocabulary). In addition, the PPVT-R correlated positively and significantly with the ITPA Psycho-Linguistic Quotient (PLQ) (.72) and the ITPA) subtests, with coefficients that ranged from .38 (auditory sequential memory) to .72 (grammatic closure). Regression analyses determined that the ITPA PLQ and the PPVT-R standard score were not predictive of one another. The data are interpreted to suggest that the PPVT-R is not more appropriately used as a measure of receptive language ability than as a screen for intellectual functioning.