Some muddles in the models

Some muddles in the models
复制标题

模型中的一些混乱

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. M. Schneider
D. M. Schneider
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. M. Schneider

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

第一部分。联盟一是由杜蒙(1961a)首次提出的̳联盟理论及其与所谓的̳血统理论的对立。联盟理论显然植根于涂尔干和毛斯,它具体产生于列维-施特劳斯的结构--L导师。。。(1949年),由L·施特劳斯、杜蒙、利奇和李约瑟开发。血统理论也植根于涂尔干和毛斯,但它的发展经历了拉德克利夫-布朗到福特、古迪、高夫、格卢克曼,在某些方面,还包括弗斯。
Part one. Alliance I. The phrase ̳alliance theory‘ and its opposition to what has been called ̳descent theory‘ was first suggested by Dumont (1961a). Alliance theory, with roots clearly in Durkheim and Mauss, has specifically arisen out of Levi-Strauss‘s Structures élémentaires . . . (1949) and has been developed by Lévi-Strauss, Dumont, Leach, and Needham. Descent theory also has its roots in Durkheim and Mauss, but its development has been through Radcliffe-Brown to Fortes, Goody, Gough, Gluckman, and, in certain respects, Firth.