Does an ELF phonology exist?

Does an ELF phonology exist?
复制标题

ELF 音系是否存在?

DOI:
10.1080/13488678.2019.1706135
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
O’Neal George
O’Neal George
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
青木 博史;高山 善行;O’Neal George

文献摘要

相似文献

本文声称,由于英语作为通用语(ELF)的使用者有时会将音素和音素联想到音素和音素,所以ELF音系学是存在的。然而,ELF音系学需要修改传统的音素和音素变音概念,以考虑到ELF用户更多地出现在临时国际群体中,而不是语音社区。具体地说,这项研究考察了发音协商,在这种协商中,ELF用户将一些语音差异定位为语义对等,而将另一些语音差异定位为语义不同。虽然传统音系学会将不同的音素描述为属于同一音素的同音素,不同的音素将语义差异实例化为不同的音素,但本研究认为,这些概念与语言变体及其言语社区的概念联系太紧密,不适用于ELF音系学,因此新的命名是必要的和必要的。
This article claims that because English as a lingua franca (ELF) users sometimes orient to phones as something reminiscent of both phonemes and allophones, an ELF phonology exists. However, an ELF phonology necessitates modifying the traditional concepts of phoneme and allophone to account for the fact that ELF users are more often in Transient International Groups than speech communities. Specifically, this study examines pronunciation negotiations within which ELF users orient to some phonetic differences as semantically equivalent and to others as semantically different. Although traditional phonology would describe different phones that instantiate semantic equivalence as belonging to allophones of the same phoneme, and different phones that instantiate semantic difference as belonging to different phonemes, this study argues that these concepts are too tied to the notion of a language variety and its speech community to be applicable to an ELF phonology, and thus new nomenclature is warranted and necessary.