What is interaction ? Are there different types ?

What is interaction ? Are there different types ?
复制标题

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hugh Dubberly;Usman Haque
Hugh Dubberly;Usman Haque
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hugh Dubberly;Usman Haque

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

梅雷迪思·戴维斯 (Meredith Davis) 认为,交互不仅仅是计算机的特殊领域。她指出,印刷书籍邀请互动,设计师会考虑读者如何与书籍互动。她引用了马西莫·维格内利 (Massimo Vignelli) 在国家奥杜邦学会北美鸟类实地指南中的工作作为特别深思熟虑的互动设计的一个例子。1 理查德·布坎南 (Richard Buchanan) 分享了戴维斯对互动的广泛看法。布坎南将早期的设计框架(关注形式,以及最近关注意义和背景)与相对较新的设计框架(关注交互)进行了对比。2交互是一种构建人与为他们设计的物体之间关系的方式,因此也是一种构建设计活动的方式。所有的人造物体都提供了交互的可能性,所有的设计活动都可以被视为交互的设计。不仅物体如此,空间、信息和系统也是如此。交互是功能的一个关键方面,而功能是设计的一个关键方面。戴维斯和布坎南扩展了我们看待设计的方式,并建议将人工制品与人类的互动作为评估所有设计工作结果的标准。他们的观点提出了一个问题:与静态对象的交互与与动态系统的交互是否不同?
Meredith Davis has argued that interaction is not the special province of computers alone. She points out that printed books invite interaction and that designers consider how readers will interact with books. She cites Massimo Vignelli’s work on the National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Birds as an example of particularly thoughtful design for interaction.1 Richard Buchanan shares Davis’s broad view of interaction. Buchanan contrasts earlier design frames (a focus on form and, more recently, a focus on meaning and context) with a relatively new design frame (a focus on interaction).2 Interaction is a way of framing the relationship between people and objects designed for them—and thus a way of framing the activity of design. All man-made objects offer the possibility for interaction, and all design activities can be viewed as design for interaction.The same is true not only of objects but also of spaces, messages, and systems. Interaction is a key aspect of function, and function is a key aspect of design. Davis and Buchanan expand the way we look at design and suggest that artifact-human interaction be a criterion for evaluating the results of all design work. Their point of view raises the question: Is interaction with a static object different from interaction with a dynamic system?