Tuning Dimensions of Complexes through Selective In Situ Reaction, Mechanistic Insights into Ni(II)-Catalyzed Br–OH Exchange, Magnetic Properties, and Density Functional Theory Studies

Tuning Dimensions of Complexes through Selective In Situ Reaction, Mechanistic Insights into Ni(II)-Catalyzed Br–OH Exchange, Magnetic Properties, and Density Functional Theory Studies
复制标题

通过选择性原位反应调节配合物的尺寸、Ni(II) 催化的 Br-OH 交换的机理见解、磁性和密度泛函理论研究

DOI:
10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03643
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Kun Yuan
Kun Yuan
中科院分区:
化学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chang-Dai Si;Jian-Bin Zhang;Feng-Feng Pan;Xu Yan;Peng Wang;Dong-Qian Xue;Xiu-Juan Li;Jia-Cheng Liu;Kun Yuan

文献摘要

相似文献

在水热条件下合成了[Mn3(L)2(4,4′-bipy)2(H2O)2]n(1)和[Ni(L1)(1,4-bib)(H2O)]n(2) (H3L = 5-(3-羟基苯氧基)间苯二甲酸,H2L1= 5-(3-羟基苯氧基)间苯二甲酸,4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-联吡啶,1,4-bib = 1,4-双(1h -咪唑-1-基)苯))。最值得注意的是,在溴原子诱导效应的帮助下,在配合物2的结构中观察到配体转化,并通过单晶x射线晶体学和x射线光电子能谱(XPS)对其进行了彻底的研究。引人注目的是,在此过程中,Ni(II)离子既被用作配位原子,又被用作H3L原位Br-OH交换的催化剂,因此产物倾向于形成一维链。同样的反应不能在1中发生,从而形成二维结构。此外,利用密度泛函理论(DFT)计算很好地解释了Ni(II)催化和磁交换机制。最后,配合物1 - 2由于分子间弱相互作用(C-Br··π、C-H··π、C-H··O和π··π堆积)而表现出三维(3D)超分子结构,并表现出完全不同的反铁磁耦合相互作用。
Two coordination polymers (CPs), namely, [Mn3(L)2(4,4′-bipy)2(H2O)2]n(1) and [Ni(L1)(1,4-bib)(H2O)]n(2) (H3L = 5-(3-bromo-4-carboxyphenoxy)isophthalic acid, H2L1= 5-(3-hydroxyphenoxy)isophthalic acid, 4,4′-bpy = 4,4′-bipyridine, and 1,4-bib = 1,4-bis(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzene), were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions. Most notably, with the help of the bromine atom-inducing effect, ligand transformation was observed in the structure of complex2, which was scrutinized thoroughly by single crystal X-ray crystallography and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Strikingly, Ni(II) ions were utilized as both coordinated atoms and as a catalyst for in situ Br–OH exchange of H3L in the process, as a result of which the product would have preferred to form a one-dimensional chain. The same reaction cannot happen in1, leading to form a two-dimensional structure. Moreover, Ni(II)-catalyzed and magnetic exchange mechanisms were well interpreted using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Finally, complexes1–2show three-dimensional (3D) supramolecular structures because of intermolecular weak interactions (C–Br···π, C–H···π, C–H···O, and π···π stacking) and exhibit utterly different antiferrimagnetic coupling interactions.