East Asian ideas of regionalism: a normative critique
East Asian ideas of regionalism: a normative critique
复制标题
东亚区域主义思想：规范性批判
DOI：
10.1080/1035771032000184791
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Baogang He
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baogang He
几乎没有人以地区主义的名义挑战民族主义的假设。他们认为民族主义是一个敏感的问题，最好留给地区主义的后期阶段，他们并没有关注媒体和其他地方的民族主义观点如何阻碍地区主义和国际主义。 吉尔伯特·罗兹曼（2000：18）随着区域一体化和发展的不断深入，关于亚洲区域发展的各种观点和建议层出不穷。本文考察了地区主义思想的历史演变、亚洲地区主义的含义、亚洲地区主义的演变及其对东亚地区合作的影响。它讨论了马哈蒂尔的新亚洲主义思想，日本的新亚洲主义，中国的地区主义思想，以及韩国地区主义思想的变体。报告还审查了区域主义的规范基础，特别是主权问题。本文认为，东亚地区主义的背后是民族主义，民族主义是地区主义的驱动力;两种相互竞争的秩序（亚太地区主义与泛亚主义）对东亚地区的发展产生了不同的期望和愿景，它们处于紧张状态，并导致不同的方向;东亚缺乏一个令人信服的和可接受的规范框架。
Little was done to challenge nationalist assumptions in the name of regionalism. Regarding nationalism as a sensitive matter best left to a later stage of regionalism, they [advocates of regionalism] did not focus on how nationalist outlooks in the media and elsewhere stand in the way of both regionalism and internationalism. Gilbert Rozman (2000: 18) With an increasing regional integration and development, there are many competing ideas of, and proposals for, regional development in Asia. This article examines the historical evolution of the idea of regionalism, the meanings of Asian regionalisms, variations of Asian regionalisms and their impact on regional cooperation in East Asia. It discusses Mahathir's idea of neo‐Asianism, Japanese new Asianism, Chinese ideas of regionalism, and variations of Korean ideas of regionalism. It also examines a normative basis of regionalism with special reference to the sovereignty question. The paper concludes that behind East Asian regionalism is nationalism which constitutes driving forces for regionalism; that two competing orders (Asia‐Pacific regionalism versus pan‐Asianism) create different expectations and visions of how East Asia region should evolve and they are in tensions and lead to different directions; and that East Asia lacks a convincing and acceptable normative framework.1