Democracy Is Democracy Is Democracy? Changes in Evaluations of International Institutions in Academic Textbooks, 1970–2010
Democracy Is Democracy Is Democracy? Changes in Evaluations of International Institutions in Academic Textbooks, 1970–2010
复制标题
民主是民主还是民主?
DOI:
10.1111/insp.12069
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Tobias Weise
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dingwerth;Ina Lehmann;Ellen Reichel;Tobias Weise
This article examines whatdemocracymeans when it is used in academic textbook evaluations of international institutions and how the meaning of the term “democracy” in such evaluations has changed over time. An analysis of 71 textbooks on international institutions in the policy areas of international security, environmental, and human rights politics leads us to several answers. We observe slight changes in relation to three aspects. First, the range of democracy-relevant actors expands over time, most notably in relation to nonstate actors as important participants in (or even subjects of) international policymaking. Second, representational concerns become more relevant in justifying demands for greater participation in international institutions. Third, international organizations are increasingly discussed not only as subjects that enhance the transparency and accountability of the policies of their member states, but also as the objects of democratic demands for transparency and accountability themselves.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Fierke
通讯作者:
K. Fierke
DOI:
10.2307/2080425
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
The Journal of American History
影响因子:
--
作者:
E. Rosenberg
通讯作者:
E. Rosenberg
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
M. Sullivan
通讯作者:
M. Sullivan
影响因子:
--
作者:
Robert L. Amett;W. Ebert;Raymond E. McPhail;S.;Mal
通讯作者:
Mal
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
M. Zürn;Martin Binder;Matthias Ecker
通讯作者:
Matthias Ecker