Militants, criminals, and warlords: the challenge of local governance in an age of disorder
Militants, criminals, and warlords: the challenge of local governance in an age of disorder
复制标题
武装分子、罪犯和军阀:混乱时代地方治理的挑战
DOI:
10.1080/24761028.2020.1726598
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Saya Kiba
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
島本 廉;岡村 勝友;Saya Kiba
It is widely accepted that nonstate actors contribute to the successful maintenance and development of the sovereign state. Indeed, the World Bank’s discourse on good governance and social accountability has for decades acknowledged–and placed increasing importance on–the benefits of engaging with a range with nonstate entities. 1 However, a facile and pernicious logic has divided these groups into the opposed categories of “civil/good” and “armed/bad” actors. On one hand, it is regarded as axiomatic that, for functioning civil states, nonstate actors including the private sector, the media, and nongovernment organizations (NGOs) enhance development and public spending; strengthen transparency and oversight of budgetary resources; provide useful services; and help to check and balance institutions. 2 On the other hand, evidence supporting such claims for weak or absent states, where access to resources, opportunity, faith in government, and basic security can be scarce, is harder to come by.In Militants, Criminals, and Warlords, Felbab-Brown, Trinkunas, and Hamid ask how we should evaluate the nature of a range of heterogeneous, armed nonstate actors from the Middle East and South America, and–by extension–unstable regions across the world. They question the reductive notion that all such groups are merely “bad” actors, exploring how