AIDS and intravenous drug use in San Francisco.
AIDS and intravenous drug use in San Francisco.
复制标题
旧金山的艾滋病和静脉注射毒品。
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Chaisson Re
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mossadeq Ar;Chaisson Re
The Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Epidemiology Group at San Francisco General hospital launched a testing and diversion program in 1985 aimed at halting the spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among intravenous drug abusers. The HIV seropositivity rate among San Franciscos intravenous drug users is estimated at 13% with the highest risk among Black men in their 30s. Based on the deterrent effect observed in the gay community of notifying risk group members of their seropositive status it was decided to use the HIV antibody test as a public health tool among drug users as well. The cooperation of the methadone and detoxification programs that treat the majority of San Franciscos drug addicts was gained and periodic screenings were held on site in each program and on the streets. Seropositives who are identified through this process are diverted into special treatment programs encompassing safe sex and drug equipment education notification of sexual partners and referrals to social services and treatment resources. 75% of the drug addicts tested in the programs 3 years of operation have reported to the hospital to receive the results of their antibody test and 80% of the seropositives identified have agreed to enter a clinical follow-up program. Although there as been some slowing of the overall rate at which seropositives have been detected in drug treatment programs in recent years this rate actually increased among San Francisco blacks--from 15% in 1985 to 35% in 1987. Overall the experience of this California screening program suggests several guidelines: 1) screening should be anonymous and confidential; 2) subjects should be given their antibody test results face to face; 3) results should be given away from the treatment program with no threat of notification; 4) referral for addiction treatment and clinical follow-up should be available to all seropositives; and 5) a small fee or at least expense reimbursement should be provided for visits.