Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Soft Tissue Response
Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Soft Tissue Response
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.006
复制
发表时间：
2009-04-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Flores-Mir, Carlos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kaipatur, Neelambar R.;Flores-Mir, Carlos
目的：本系统综述的目的是研究计算机程序预测正颌手术后骨骼变化后软组织反应的准确性。材料和方法：使用Ovid Medline、Ovid Medline in-process和其他非索引引文、所有EBM综述（包括Cochrane DSR、ACP journal、DARE、CCTR）、Embase Experta Medica、Pascal和Thomsen的ISI Web of Science数据库进行系统的计算机数据库检索。搜索词包括正畸外科、正畸治疗、计算机预测、计算机模拟、生长预测、准确性、精度、预测和人类研究。我们还检索了所有入选文章的参考文献列表，以查找在数据库电子检索中可能遗漏的潜在文章，并直接从来源（通过与作者联系）获得文章中无法获得的其他信息。结果：在最初确定的40篇文章中，只有7篇文章符合最终的选择标准。与水平和垂直方向的实际结果相比，所有7项研究总体上都显示了准确的预测结果（小于2毫米）。在所有可用的计算机预测程序中，使用频率最高的是Quick Ceph， DentoFacial Planner （DFP）和computer - assisted Simulation System for Orthognathic Surgery （CASSOS）。结论：现有的计算机预测程序预测误差最大的区域是下唇区域。虽然单个误差几乎总是最小的（小于2毫米），但这些最小误差的组合可能具有临床意义。(C) 2009年美国口腔颌面外科医师协会
Purpose: The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the accuracy of computer programs in predicting soft tissue response Subsequent to skeletal changes after orthognathic surgery.Materials and Methods: A systematic computerized database search was conducted using Ovid Medline, Ovid Medline in-process and other nonindexed citations, all EBM reviews (including Cochrane DSR, ACP journal, DARE, CCTR), Embase Experta Medica, Pascal, and Thomsen's ISI Web of Science databases. The terms orthognathic surgery, orthodontic treatment, computer prediction, computer Simulation, growth prediction, accuracy, precision, forecast, and human Studies were used for the searches. The reference lists of all the selected articles were also searched for any potential articles that might have been missed in the electronic search of the database, and additional information not available through the articles was obtained directly from the source (by contacting the author).Results: Out of the 40 initially identified articles only 7 articles fulfilled the final selection criteria. All 7 studies in general showed accurate prediction outcomes (less than 2 mm) when compared with actual results in both horizontal and vertical directions. From all the available computer prediction programs Quick Ceph, DentoFacial Planner (DFP), and Computer-Assisted Simulation System for Orthognathic Surgery (CASSOS) were the most frequently used.Conclusions: The most significant area of error in prediction through the available computer prediction programs was the lower lip area. Although the individual errors are almost always minimal (less than 2 mm), the composite addition of these minimal errors could have clinical implications. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial, Surgeons