High-Intensity Interval Training for Cognitive and Mental Health in Adolescents

High-Intensity Interval Training for Cognitive and Mental Health in Adolescents
复制标题

DOI:
10.1249/mss.0000000000000993
复制
发表时间:
2016-10-01
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Lubans, David R.
Lubans, David R.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Costigan, Sarah A.;Eather, Narelle;Lubans, David R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的新兴的文献表明,体育活动和健身可能对青少年的认知和心理健康产生积极影响。本研究的目的是评估两种高强度间歇训练(HIIT)方案对改善认知和心理健康结果的有效性(执行功能、心理健康、心理困扰和身体自我概念)。方法(n = 65;平均年龄= 15.8 ± 0.6岁)被随机分为三个条件:有氧运动计划(AEP; n = 21),阻力和有氧计划(RAP; n = 22),和控制(n = 22)。HIIT课程(每次8-10分钟)在体育课期间或午餐时间进行,每周三次,共8周。在基线和干预后立即进行评估,以检测执行功能(连线测试),心理健康,心理困扰和身体自我描述的变化,由对治疗分配不知情的研究人员进行。采用线性混合模型对干预效果进行了检验。科恩的d效应大小和临床推理也计算。结果虽然结果并不显着,执行功能的小改善,(平均变化(95% CI)-6.69(-22.03,8.64),d = -0.32)和心理健康(平均变化(95%CI)2.81(-2.06,7.68),d = 0.34);以及执行功能的适度改善(平均变化(95% CI)-10.73(-26.22,4.76),d = -0.51),幸福感略有改善(平均变化(95%CI)2.96(-1.82,7.75),d = 0.36)和感觉外观(平均变化(95%CI)0.32(-0.25,0.86),d = 0.35)。平均感觉状态分数改善,从preworkout到postworkout在两个HIIT条件下,具有显着的结果为AEP(P = 0.001)。结论本研究强调了嵌入HIIT在学校的一天,改善青少年的认知和心理健康的潜力。
Purpose Emerging literature suggests that physical activity and fitness may have a positive effect on cognitive and mental health in adolescents. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of two high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols for improving cognitive and mental health outcomes (executive function, psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-concept) in adolescents.Methods Participants (n = 65; mean age = 15.8 0.6 yr) were randomized to three conditions: aerobic exercise program (AEP; n = 21), resistance and aerobic program (RAP; n = 22), and control (n = 22). HIIT sessions (8-10 min per session) were delivered during physical education lessons or at lunchtime three times per week for 8 wk. Assessments were conducted at baseline and immediately postintervention to detect changes in executive function (trail making test), psychological well-being, psychological distress, and physical self-description by researchers blinded to treatment allocation. Intervention effects were examined using linear mixed models. Cohen's d effect sizes and clinical inference were also calculated.Results While results were not significant, small improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -6.69 (-22.03, 8.64), d = -0.32) and psychological well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.81 (-2.06, 7.68), d = 0.34) were evident in the AEP group; and moderate improvements in executive function (mean change (95% CI) -10.73 (-26.22, 4.76), d = -0.51), and small improvements in well-being (mean change (95% CI) 2.96 (-1.82, 7.75), d = 0.36) and perceived appearance (mean change (95% CI) 0.32 (-0.25, 0.86), d = 0.35), were observed for the RAP group. Mean feeling state scores improved from preworkout to postworkout in both HIIT conditions, with significant results for the AEP (P = 0.001).Conclusions This study highlights the potential of embedding HIIT within the school day for improving cognitive and mental health among adolescents.