Physics research
Physics research
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/302102a0
复制
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
影响因子:
64.8
通讯作者:
T. Berlincourt
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Berlincourt
SIR-" Basic physics in doldrums"(Nature 300, 571; 1982) summarized the findings of a study," Trends in Research Output and Funding"(Physics Today, p. 9 November 1982) which I conducted in collaboration with Harold Weinstock, Francis Narin and Samuel R. Reisher. While the Nature article provides excellent coverage of a number of the salient findings of our study, the opening sentence attributes to us a judgement which we were careful not to make, that" Basic physics research in the United States is declining in quality compared with Europe..." In point of fact we applied no quality measures in our study. Rather, we compiled data on (I) the numbers (quantities) of papers published in Physical Review Letters and in Applied Physics Letters by various performing sectors and (2) the numbers (quantities) of papers attributed to various funding sources. The findings led us to comment that" We view these trends with concern and believe they correspond to a reduction-in real terms-of US activity in basic physics since the late 1960s". The emphasis here is on the reduction in the quantity (not quality) of activity. The Nature article also asserts that''The ONR study speculates that this dramatic shift in foreign contributions might be caused by editorial policy". In actuality, referring to Physical Review Letters, we commented only that" The total number of papers published per year by all sources rises untill968 and thereafter remains relatively constant at approximately 1, 000 papers per year, presumably a consequence of editorial policy". Although the presumption in the last phrase proved to be incorrect, our statement contains no speculation that editorial policy might have caused a shift in foreign contributions. It is recognized that varying interpretations of our data are possible. For readers who might wish to draw their own conclusions from the original data I shall be pleased to provide, on request, copies of a more comprehensive version of the report than that which appeared in Physics Today. TED G. BERLINCOURT