Iron Oxides in the Laboratory
Iron Oxides in the Laboratory
复制标题
DOI：
10.1180/minmag.1992.056.383.20
复制
发表时间：
1992-06
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
J. Bowles
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Bowles
在《矿物学评论》的25卷中，到目前为止只有两卷是单独作者的作品，第一卷是埃德·罗德的《流体包裹体》，这是第二卷。在这本书中，Kerrick博士向我们介绍了A12SiO5矿物的各个方面，包括它们的结构、性质等，以及它们在花岗岩和混杂岩中的出现情况——许多读者可能没有考虑到这一点。共分11章，分别为：引言；晶体结构、光学性质和物理性质；相变平衡；non-stoichiometry;晶格缺陷;硅线石A1/Si紊乱；纤维岩问题；变质反应;反应动力学和晶体生长机理；铝交代;暗映型混辉岩和过铝质花岗岩中的硅铝。这部专著是由一份大约1000篇参考文献的清单完成的。毫无疑问，最长的一章是关于相平衡的，它占据了72页。在这本书中，作者讨论了所有主要的实验研究，并在每个案例中都添加了自己对实验的批评。在许多情况下，他对提出的结果给出了另一种解释，但他的评论非常公正。他对本章的结论是，他希望在尽可能纯AI2SiO5成分的材料上看到红柱石-硅线石平衡的“紧密”实验支架。据本审稿人判断，Kerrick博士没有说明他对表格点的P和T的偏好数字；然而在最新一期的美国Mineralogicst海明威Robie纸,埃文斯和那天(1991年,页1597 - 1612)给出了P 3.87 + 0.3千巴和T值511 ~ + 20 ~岩石学家谁的利益更定向,章节8日9日和10日可能会很受欢迎,因为那天非常彻底和文献回顾提出很多的细节,这些矿物质的发生的例子,说明地图和显微照片。不幸的是，这个评论者唯一熟悉的地图上有一个重叠的比例尺，这个比例尺肯定是错的。许多章节都以引文开头，这些引文都是精心挑选的。其中一篇来自W. S. Fyfe(1969)，指的是实验主义者对A1203-SIO2系统的痴迷，他说：“对于涉及岩石的同样问题，还有其他系统可能会产生更精确的信息，我们在这个系统上的进展并不能完全提高我们对自己能力的信心。”作者没有引用理查森和鲍威尔的一段话，他们试图推断出苏格兰中部高地变质高潮的压力和温度：他们写道：“这可以在不求助于A12SiO5相图的血腥领域的情况下完成。”F. J. Turner在他关于“变形”的教科书的第二版中错误地引用了这句话（可能是故意的），并用“bloody”代替了“bloody”。在英国，这两个词的用法完全不同。克里克医生让这个领域更加血腥。《矿物学评论》的审稿人和编辑做出了一个明智的决定，接受了Derrill Kerrick的专著，因为它的出版价格是大多数研究生都能负担得起的，而且任何认真研究变质岩石学的学生都不应该没有这本书。w·s·麦肯齐
In the 25 volumes of Reviews in Mineralogy so far only two have been single author works, the first was on Fluid Inclusions by Ed Roedder and this is the second. In this volume Dr. Kerrick presents us with a very thorough treatment of all aspects of the A12SiO5 minerals from their structure, properties, etc. and their occurrence in granites and migmatites--something many readers will not have considered. The 11 chapters are entitled: Introduction; crystal structures, optical and physical properties; phase transition equilibria; non-stoichiometry; lattice defects; A1/Si disorder in sillimanite; the fibrolite problem; metamorphic reactions; reaction kinetics and crystal growth mechanisms; aluminium metasomatism; aluminium silicates in anatectic migmatites and peraluminous granitic rocks. The monograph is completed by a list of perhaps 1000 references. The longest chapter is, not-surprisingly, on phase equilibria which occupies 72 pages. In this the author discusses all the main experimental studies and in each case adds his own critique of their experiments. In many cases he has given an alternative interpretation of the results presented but he has been extremely fair in his comments. His conclusion to this chapter is that he would like to see 'tight' experimental brackets on the andalusite-sillimanite equilibrium on materials which are as nearly as possible pure AI2SiO5 composition. As far as this reviewer can judge, Dr. Kerrick does not state his preferred figure for the P and T of the table point; however in the latest issue of American Mineralogicst a paper by Hemingway Robie, Evans and Kerrick (1991, pp. 1597-1612) gives the values of P 3.87 + 0.3 kbar and T 511 ~ + 20~ To the petrologist whose interests are more field-oriented, chapters 8, 9 and 10 will probably be very welcome because Kerrick has reviewed the literature very thoroughly and presents details of very many examples of the occurrence of these minerals, illustrated with maps and photomicrographs. The only map with which this reviewer has some familiarity has unfortunately had a scale superimposed which must be wrong by a factor of 10. Many of the chapters begin with a quotation and these are very well chosen. One of them from W. S. Fyfe (1969), referring to the experimentalists' obsession with the system A1203-SIO2, states: 'There are other systems that can perhaps yield more exact information about the same problems involving rocks, and our progress in this system does not exactly promote confidence in our abilities.' One quotation which the author did not use is from Richardson and Powell who were attempting to deduce the pressure and temperature of the metamorphic climax in the Central Highlands of Scotland: they wrote that 'this can be done without recourse to the bloodied field of the A12SiO5 phase diagram.' F. J. Turner in the Second edition of his text book on 'Metamorphism' misquoted this (probably on purpose) and replaced the word 'bloodied' by 'bloody' and in the United Kingdom these two words are used quite differently. Dr. Kerrick has bloodied the field even more. The reviewers and Editor of Reviews in Mineralogy made a wise decision in accepting Derrill Kerrick's monograph for this series because it is published at a price which most graduate students will be able to afford and no serious student of metamorphic petrology should be without this book. W. S. MACKENZIE