Toward a climate mobilities research agenda: Intersectionality, immobility, and policy responses
Toward a climate mobilities research agenda: Intersectionality, immobility, and policy responses
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102315
复制
发表时间：
2021-07-04
影响因子：
8.9
通讯作者：
Maharjan, Amina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cundill, Georgina;Singh, Chandni;Maharjan, Amina
流动性是一项关键的生计和风险管理战略，包括在气候变化背景下。2019冠状病毒病大流行加剧了人们长期以来的担忧，即在经济发展、适应气候变化和空间规划方面，移民人口仍然在很大程度上被忽视。我们综合多项研究的证据，证实在亚洲和非洲的气候变化热点地区，国内和短距离移民而不是国际移民占压倒性优势。新出现的调查结果突出表明，在发展政策中，解决不流动问题和影响谁能流动谁不能流动的交叉社会决定因素至关重要。这一证据表明，气候流动性研究议程应更加集中，包括理解流动性和多方向流动的多种驱动因素;决定某些人流动性和其他人不流动性的交叉社会因素;以及气候变化和COVID-19复苏对流动性和不流动性的影响。
Mobility is a key livelihood and risk management strategy, including in the context of climate change. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced long standing concerns that migrant populations remain largely overlooked in economic development, adaptation to climate change, and spatial planning. We synthesize evidence across multiple studies that confirms the overwhelming preponderance of in-country and short distance rather than international migration in climate change hotspots in Asia and Africa. The emerging findings highlight the critical importance of addressing immobility and the intersecting social determinants that influence who can move and who cannot in development policy. This evidence suggests a more focused climate mobilities research agenda that includes understanding multiple drivers of mobility and multi-directional movement; intersecting social factors that determine mobility for some and immobility for others; and the implications for mobility and immobility under climate change and the COVID-19 recovery.