THE MORAL COSTS OF NASTINESS
THE MORAL COSTS OF NASTINESS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00309.x
复制
发表时间：
2011-04-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Herrmann, Benedikt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Abbink, Klaus;Herrmann, Benedikt
我们介绍了两个变种的一杆快乐的破坏迷你游戏（迷你JOD）。两个玩家被赋予相同数量的钱。他们同时决定是否以自己的代价减少对方的收益。在一种治疗方法中，自然有可能摧毁对手的钱。我们测试这一功能是否降低了肮脏的道德成本，并发现破坏率显着上升，尽管缺乏战略原因。(JEL C72、C91、D03）。
We introduce two variants of the one-shot joy-of-destruction minigame (mini-JOD). Two players are endowed with the same amount of money. They simultaneously decide whether or not to reduce the other player's payoff at an own cost. In one treatment there was a probability that nature would destroy the opponent's money anyway. We test whether this feature reduces the moral costs of nastiness, and find that destruction rates rise significantly, despite the absence of strategic reasons. (JEL C72, C91, D03).