Experimental Syntax and Island Effects: Computational models of acquisition for islands
Experimental Syntax and Island Effects: Computational models of acquisition for islands
复制标题
实验语法和岛屿效应:岛屿获取的计算模型
DOI:
10.1017/cbo9781139035309.006
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Jon Sprouse
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lisa Pearl;Jon Sprouse
1. Why look at language acquisition? Though it is not always directly stated, the debate at the center of this volume is in many ways driven by language acquisition considerations. Long-‐distance dependencies are themselves relatively complex, as they involve context-‐sensitive grammatical operations (e.g., wh-‐movement or slash-‐passing). The existence of context-‐sensitive operations alone increases the complexity of the hypothesis space of possible grammars that must be considered by children during the acquisition process. If island effects are indeed the result of grammatical constraints, then the hypothesis space increases yet again, as the grammar must also contain complex constraints on context-‐sensitive operations. A common hypothesis in the generative syntax literature is that this level of complexity (constraints on context-‐sensitive grammatical operations) cannot be learned directly from the input that children receive (i.e., this is a poverty of the stimulus problem). As such, many generative syntacticians have postulated the existence of innate domain-‐specific knowledge about the form that such constraints must take. In other words, the grammatical approach to island effects is often correlated with a nativist, or Universal Grammar (UG) based, view of language acquisition. In this way, a reductionist approach to island effects could be seen as a type of simplifying approach to the grammar, as it could eliminate the need for one set of innate constraints on the shape of human grammars. Because of this, it seems to us that discussions of " parsimony " and " simplification " in the