Reply to Piper: Aquilonifer 's kites are not mites
Reply to Piper: Aquilonifer 's kites are not mites
复制标题
回复 Piper: Aquilonifer 的风筝不是螨虫
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1606265113
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Briggs D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Briggs D
Piper (1) offers the fascinating observation that the attachment of small arthropods by threads to the Silurian arthropod Aquilonifer (2) is similar to that of the nymphs of Uropodina mites to larger arthropods (eg, beetles) to facilitate their dispersal in patchy habitats (phoresy). Clearly these two examples are profoundly separated by time (∼ 430 Mya) and ecology (the one fully marine, the other terrestrial), but it is worth considering the possibility that the adherence of tiny arthropods to Aquilonifer represents the behavior of some sort of marine mite ancestor.The oldest unequivocal fossil mites are from the Lower Devonian (∼ 411 Mya) Rhynie Chert of Scotland (3). An older record from the Lower Ordovician of Öland (4) is considered doubtful (5). Fossil evidence of coprolites associated with land plant remains, however, suggests that mites were present in Silurian terrestrial ecosystems (6). Phylogenetic analyses of Acari based on molecular data (7) place the origin of mites in the early Silurian (Llandovery) and a broader consideration of arthropod time trees (8) pushes the origin of mites back to the Early Ordovician. Thus, there is evidence that the origin and presumably terrestrial radation of mites predates the Silurian Herefordshire biota and the occurrence of Aquilonifer. We considered the possibility that the arthropods attached to Aquilonifer represent epizoans or parasites and concluded that this is less likely than their being juveniles (2). We focused on behavioral comparisons with crustaceans because they represent almost