Semantic and associative priming in picture naming

Semantic and associative priming in picture naming
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/027249800410535
复制
发表时间:
2000-08-01
期刊:
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ferrand, L
Ferrand, L
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alario, FX;Segui, J;Ferrand, L

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们报告了四个图片命名实验,在这些实验中,图片的前面有视觉呈现的单词质数。素数可以在语义上与图片相关(例如,“船”-火车:坐标对)或关联相关(例如,“巢”-鸟:相关对)。在这些条件下的表现总是与在无关条件下的表现进行比较(例如,“FLOW”-CAT)。为了清楚地区分前两种素数,我们选择了这样的材料:(A)坐标对中的单词没有口头关联,(B)关联对不是坐标对。结果表明,两种相关条件的表现方式不同,这取决于词和图片的刺激起始异步性(SOA),而不是呈现时间的长短。当呈现一个简短的SOA(114ms,实验1)时,两个相关条件产生干扰效应,但相关的条件与不相关的条件没有显著差异。相反,对于较长的SOA(234ms,实验2),坐标启动没有产生任何影响,而相关启动被观察到显著的促进效应,与启动呈现的持续时间无关。在当前言语产生模式的背景下,这种差异被解释为在自动加工水平上存在两种不同的意义关联的论点。
We report four picture-naming experiments in which the pictures were preceded by visually presented word primes. The primes could either be semantically related to the picture (e.g., "boat" - TRAIN: co-ordinate pairs) or associatively related (e.g., "nest" - BIRD: associated pairs). Performance under these conditions was always compared to performance under unrelated conditions (e.g.,"flower" - CAT). In order to distinguish clearly the first two kinds of prime, we chose our materials so that (a) the words in the co-ordinate pairs were not verbally associated, and (b) the associate pairs were not co-ordinates. Results show that the two related conditions behaved in different ways depending on the stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) separating word and picture appearance, but not on how long the primes were presented.When presented with a brief SOA (114 ms, Experiment 1), the co-ordinate primes produced an interference effect, but the associated primes did not differ significantly from the unrelated primes. Conversely, with a longer SOA (234 ms, Experiment 2) the co-ordinate primes produced no effect, whereas a significant facilitation effect was observed for associated primes, independent of the duration of presentation of the primes. This difference is interpreted in the context of current models of speech production as an argument for the existence, at an automatic processing level, of two distinguishable kinds of meaning relatedness.