The Andrews' Principles of Risk, Need, and Responsivity as Applied in Drug Abuse Treatment Programs: Meta-Analysis of Crime and Drug Use Outcomes.
The Andrews' Principles of Risk, Need, and Responsivity as Applied in Drug Abuse Treatment Programs: Meta-Analysis of Crime and Drug Use Outcomes.
复制标题
安德鲁斯在药物滥用治疗计划中应用的风险、需求和响应原则：犯罪和药物使用结果的荟萃分析。
DOI：
10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Greenwell,Lisa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Prendergast,MichaelL;Pearson,FrankS;Podus,Deborah;Hamilton,ZacharyK;Greenwell,Lisa
ObjectivesThe本荟萃分析的目的是回答这个问题：可以安德鲁斯原则的风险，需求和响应，最初开发的程序，治疗罪犯，扩展到治疗药物滥用者的程序？MethodsDrawing从一个数据集，其中包括243个独立的比较，我们进行了随机效应荟萃回归和方差分析模拟荟萃分析，以测试安德鲁斯原则平均犯罪和药物使用的结果超过了一组不同的程序药物滥用problems.ResultsFor犯罪的结果，在元回归，点估计为每个原则是实质性的，与以前的研究安德鲁斯原则一致。对于展示更多原则的程序，也有一个实质性的点估计。然而，几乎所有的95%置信区间都包括零点。对于药物使用结果，在荟萃回归中，每个原则的点估计值约为零;然而，展示更多原则的项目的点估计值有些积极。所有的估计药物使用的原则有置信区间，包括zeroPoint.ConclusionsThis研究支持以前的研究结果，从主要的研究针对安德鲁斯的原则，这些原则是有效的，在减少犯罪的结果，在这里集中在药物治疗方案的元分析研究。相比之下，遵循这些原则的计划似乎对药物使用结果的影响很小。建议在药物治疗方案中进行实验测试安德鲁斯原则的初步研究。
ObjectivesThe purpose of the present meta-analysis was to answer the question: Can the Andrews principles of risk, needs, and responsivity, originally developed for programs that treat offenders, be extended to programs that treat drug abusers?MethodsDrawing from a dataset that included 243 independent comparisons, we conducted random-effects meta-regression and ANOVA-analog meta-analyses to test the Andrews principles by averaging crime and drug use outcomes over a diverse set of programs for drug abuse problems.ResultsFor crime outcomes, in the meta-regressions, the point estimates for each of the principles were substantial, consistent with previous studies of the Andrews principles. There was also a substantial point estimate for programs exhibiting a greater number of the principles. However, almost all the 95 % confidence intervals included the zero point. For drug use outcomes, in the meta-regressions, the point estimates for each of the principles was approximately zero; however, the point estimate for programs exhibiting a greater number of the principles was somewhat positive. All the estimates for the drug use principles had confidence intervals that included the zero point.ConclusionsThis study supports previous findings from primary research studies targeting the Andrews principles that those principles are effective in reducing crime outcomes, here in meta-analytic research focused on drug treatment programs. By contrast, programs that follow the principles appear to have very little effect on drug use outcomes. Primary research studies that experimentally test the Andrews principles in drug treatment programs are recommended.