Reply to Comment on “In Situ ion microprobe U‐Pb dating and REE abundances of a Carboniferous conodont” by R. Romer
Reply to Comment on “In Situ ion microprobe U‐Pb dating and REE abundances of a Carboniferous conodont” by R. Romer
复制标题
回复 R. Romer 对“石炭纪牙形刺的原位离子微探针 U-Pb 定年和 REE 丰度”的评论
DOI:
10.1029/2002gl014671
复制
发表时间:
2002
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
K. Terada
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Y. Sano;K. Terada
[1] We have reported in situ ion microprobe U-Pb dating and rare earth element (REE) abundance of a Carboniferous conodont [Sano and Terada, 2001]. In his comment on the paper, Romer [2002] claims that the initial Pb isotopic compositions (Pb/Pb = 13.0 ± 2.5 and Pb/Pb = 12.2 ± 1.5 at 2s) calculated in the sample are unexpectedly less radiogenic and should not be found in Carboniferous marine fossil. Furthermore a few Pb/Pb ratios are less radiogenic than that of primordial Pb in Canyon Diablo troilite, which is in conflict with any Pb evolution models of the Earth [e.g., Stacey and Kramers, 1975; Cumming and Richards, 1975 Zartman and Doe, 1981]. Romer [2002] suggests that the significantly low Pb/Pb ratios may originate from analytical problems, probably due to the overestimation of Pb signal and it is necessary to check Hg interference since Hg (203.97348) is not resolved from Pb (203.97303) at the mass resolution of 5800 adopted in Sano and Terada [2001] experiment. [2] The advantage of the ion microprobe technique over the conventional isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) after chemical dissolution and separation is preservation of the important textual context of sample and to provide an opportunity for other simultaneous analytical work such as REE abundances [Sano et al., 1999]. We have carried out ion microprobe experiment using exactly the same sample. The Carboniferous conodont cast in epoxy resin discs was evacuated in the sample lock of the SHRIMP II at Hiroshima University overnight in order to further reduce hydride interference. A primary O2 beam of 2-nA was focused to a 30-mm-diameter area of the sample pit where the U-Pb analysis were already made by Sano and Terada [2001]. Secondary ions were extracted using 10 kV. The magnet was cyclically peak-stepped from mass 200 (Hg) to mass 204 (Pb + Hg), including the background and 202 for Hg, respectively. [3] Table 1 lists the A/A and A/A ratios of Carboniferous conodont except for Cono1.1.3 which we did not analyze because of apparent outlier characteristics in Figure 3 of Sano and Terada [2001]. Observed A/A ratios are consistent with the Hg/Hg ratio of 1.29 within experimental error at two sigma, indicating that there may exist Hg isotopes in the sample as claimed by Romer [2002]. Contribution of Hg at mass 204 is calculated by the Hg/Hg ratio of 0.296 and observed A/A ratio and listed in Table 1. The apparent Hg interferences vary significantly from 4% to 28%. There is no correlation between the interferences and reported Pb concentrations listed in Table 2 of Sano and Terada [2001] suggesting that Hg contaminations are probably not uniform in the sample. [4] Table 2 lists corrected Pb/Pb and Pb/Pb ratios for Hg interference based on the A/A ratios. The corrected Pb/ Pb ratios are consistent with that of common Pb value, 15.6 in 350–363 million years ago estimated by Stacey and Kramers [1975] evolution model within experimental error of two sigma, even though the ratios of a few spots (Cono1.1.7, Cono1.1.8, and Cono1.1.10) show relatively lower Pb/Pb ratios. These Pb isotopes are geochemically reasonable values, suggesting that the Hg interferences are possible. [5] We calculate the Pb* U isochron age based on the corrected Pb isotopes by using the York method. Resultant age of 323 ± 79 Ma (2s; MSWD = 0.73, error correlation = 0) is consistent with the depositional age of the fossil (350–363 Ma) within experimental error of two sigma and even though identical to the uncorrected age of 323 ± 72 Ma [Sano and Terada, 2001]. The estimated initial Pb/Pb ratio of 15 ± 7 (2s) shows large error and is not useful when considering the Hg interference. It is noted that the MSWD value decreases from 1.03 of original data to 0.73 of corrected ones, implying the increase of probability of fit. We also calculate a total Pb/U isochron age based on threedimensional linear regressions conducted as constrained to intersect Tera-Wasserburg concordia [Ludwig, 1998] using corrected Pb isotope data (Figure 1). A best-fit line yields the age of 335 ± 44 Ma (95%CL; MSWD = 0.94), which agrees with the depositional age (350–363 Ma). Again the age is identical to the uncorrected age of 332 ± 44 Ma, suggesting that the Hg contamination of up to 28% can not affect the U-Pb ages. On the other hand, initial Pb/Pb ratio of 15.0 ± 3.1 (2s) and Pb/Pb of 14.0 ± 2.0 (2s) are significantly larger than those of 13.0 ± 2.5 and 12.2 ± 1.5 based on the original data [Sano and Terada, 2001], respectively. They show marginal agreement with the common Pb/Pb ratio of 18.1 and Pb/Pb of 15.6 in 350–363 Ma [Stacey and Kramers, 1975]. [6] Romer [2002] suggests that the Pb/Pb ratios of the sample should be affected by the Hg interference and are shifted to lower values than the ratio of Pb evolution, 37.9 in 350–363 Ma [Stacey and Kramers, 1975]. In the experiment of Sano and Terada [2001] we have measured Pb for the first and second spots (Cono1.1.4 and 1.1.5) using a long integration time of 60 sec. Then we have reduced the time significantly, only one second for the other spots, since it has appeared that Th abundances were extremely small and the Th-Pb age would not be obtained. Original Pb/Pb ratios of Cono1.1.4 and 1.1.5 were 35.3 ± 15.8 (2s) and 30.5 ± 18.2 (2s), respectively. They become 38.8 and 41.8 when corrected for the Hg interference of 9% and 27%. The corrected Pb/Pb ratios are consistent with the common Pb of 37.9. [7] Finally two major concerns are given by Romer [2002]. First it is not appropriate to use analytically incorrect data to retrieve the U-Pb age. We agree with the point and it is important to check mass 200 and 202 for Hg interference by using ion microprobe when the Pb abundance is significantly small. Second the experimental error of the age (335 ± 44 Ma), about GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 29, NO. 12, 1598, 10.1029/2002GL014671, 2002