Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg
Analysing the Prisoner Voting Saga and the British Challenge to Strasbourg
复制标题
分析囚犯投票事件和英国对斯特拉斯堡的挑战
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Bates
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Bates
本文以近年来英国与斯特拉斯堡关系紧张为背景，考察了囚犯投票佐贺的发展。它从大法庭对赫斯特诉联合王国案（第2号）的判决开始，审查并批评了相关的斯特拉斯堡判例。它讨论了斯特拉斯堡和英国之间随之而来的“边缘政策”，关于该判决的执行，以及斯特拉斯堡如何通过进一步的大法庭判决（Scoppola v意大利（第3号））作出回应。对这一判决的反应是在详细审查英国与斯特拉斯堡之间的关系为何最近变得困难的背景下做出的，至少从前者的角度来看是如此。这些问题将在最后一节中讨论。
This article examines the development of the prisoner voting saga concerning the UK and Strasbourg, setting it in the context of the strained relationship existing between the former and the latter in recent years. It examines and offers a critique of the relevant Strasbourg jurisprudence, commencing with the Grand Chamber judgment in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2). It discusses the ‘brinkmanship’ that ensued between Strasbourg and the UK as regards the enforcement of that judgment, and how Strasbourg responded via a further Grand Chamber judgment (Scoppola v Italy (No 3)). The reaction to that judgment is contextualised by a detailed examination of why the relationship between the UK and Strasbourg has been a difficult one recently, at least from the former’s perspective. These issues are then reflected upon in a final section.