Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation
Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-006x.64.4.758
复制
发表时间：
1996-08-01
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Bakker, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dijkstra, A;DeVries, H;Bakker, M
在荷兰，34% 的人口吸烟，其中 70% 的吸烟者不打算戒烟。美国人口中较低的比例似乎反映了吸烟文化的差异。本研究分析了荷兰人口五个变化阶段的戒烟利弊和自我效能预期。结果与美国样本中发现的吸烟利弊模式和自我效能期望进行了比较。数据显示了假设的模式：在前两个阶段，戒烟的预期积极结果在阶段之间的区分度比自我效能感更好，而在后面的阶段，自我效能感是更好的区分度。这项研究表明，阶段类型适用于荷兰人群，并且优点、缺点和自我效能的模式与美国人群中发现的模式非常相似。
In The Netherlands, 34% of the population smoke, and 70% of these smokers are not planning to quit. The lower percentages in the U.S. population seem to reflect a difference in smoking culture. This study analyzes the pros and cons of quitting and self-efficacy expectation in the 5 stages of change in the Dutch population. The results are compared with the pattern of the pros and cons of smoking and self-efficacy expectations found in U.S. samples. The data show the hypothesized pattern: In the first 2 stages, the expected positive outcomes of quitting discriminated better between the stages than self-efficacy, whereas for later stages, self-efficacy was the better discriminator. This study shows that the stage typology is applicable to the Dutch population and that the pattern of the pros, cons, and self-efficacy is very similar to the pattern found in the U.S. populations.