Considering the Corporeal to Facilitate Research to Practice Transitions

Considering the Corporeal to Facilitate Research to Practice Transitions
复制标题

DOI:
10.5465/ambpp.2021.16406abstract
复制
发表时间:
2021-08
期刊:
Academy of Management Proceedings
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Sonia M. Goltz;Patty Sotirin
Sonia M. Goltz;Patty Sotirin
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sonia M. Goltz;Patty Sotirin

文献摘要

相似文献

作者认为,研究与实践的差距,如在循证管理中发现的差距,部分是由于缺乏对具体知识的关注。建议变革推动者在实施基于研究的变革时,要注意具体的知识。本文的目的是解决研究与实践的差距。设计/方法/approachThis是一个概念性的文件,考虑的主要方法考虑研究与实践的差距的局限性。现象学,女权主义理论和学习理论的文献形成的基础上,探索这些挑战,以及可能的解决方案,为超越的研究到实践gap.FindingsStrategic机会,引入增加correctness的理解先进。这些建议在基于研究的变革举措的三个关键阶段解决了研究与实践之间的差距。这些措施包括使具体的知识不可或缺的变化倡议,在框架研究,减少阻力,并增加接受。在讨论的具体策略是参加隐性知识时,考虑到变化,拥抱根深蒂固的身体,包括参加动觉阻力,并开始与身体,以增加接受时,实施changes.Originality/valueThere以前很少注意到corpus在管理研究和实践中,包括在组织变革文献。本文不仅大大增加了这方面的讨论,而且还为如何在实践中向前推进提供了建议。
PurposeThe authors suggest that the research-to-practice gap, such as that found in evidence-based management, is due in part to a lack of attention to embodied knowledge. The recommendation is for change agents to bring attention to embodied knowing when implementing change based on research. The purpose of the paper is to address the research-to-practice gap.Design/methodology/approachThis is a conceptual paper that considers limitations of the predominant approach to considering the research-to-practice gap. The literature on phenomenology, feminist theory, and learning theory form the basis for exploring these challenges as well as possible solutions for transcending the research-to-practice gap.FindingsStrategic opportunities for introducing increased corporeal understanding are advanced. The suggestions address the research-to-practice gap at three critical stages of research-based change initiatives. These include making embodied knowledge integral to change initiatives in framing research, reducing resistance, and increasing acceptance. Among the specific strategies discussed are attending to tacit knowledge when considering the change, embracing the embrained body including attending to kinesthetic resistance and starting with the body to increase acceptance when implementing change.Originality/valueThere has been very little previous attention to the corporeal in management research and practice, including in the organizational change literature. This paper not only increases this discussion significantly but also provides suggestions for how to move forward in practice.