Domestic Adaptations of Europe: A Comparative Study of the Debates on EU Enlargement and a Common Constitution in the German and French Quality Press
Domestic Adaptations of Europe: A Comparative Study of the Debates on EU Enlargement and a Common Constitution in the German and French Quality Press
复制标题
欧洲的国内适应：德国和法国质量出版社关于欧盟扩大和共同宪法争论的比较研究
DOI：
10.1093/ijpor/edm024
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
S. Adam
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Adam
本文探讨了为什么某个特定的欧洲问题在一个国家受到辩论而在另一个国家却被忽视，以及为什么不同欧洲国家对问题的辩论有所不同。为了理解这种国家过滤，人们对一个国家内的具体政策传统和特定问题的冲突星座如何在媒体辩论中反映出来制定了期望。对 2000-2002 年德国和法国优质媒体关于欧盟扩大和共同宪法的辩论进行的系统内容分析表明，各国之间和国家内部在问题的突出性、参与者的突出程度和参与者的责任归属方面存在相当大的差异。这种差异可以看作与不同的政策传统和冲突格局有关。该研究试图超越仅仅描述整个欧洲媒体报道的差异，并系统地利用跨国和跨问题的比较研究来理解这种差异。
The article investigates why a specific European issue is debated in one country but disregarded in another, and why issues are debated differently in different European countries. To understand this national filtering, expectations are formulated as to how specific policy traditions and issue-specific conflict constellations within a country are reflected in media debates. A systematic content analysis of the debates on EU enlargement and a common constitution for the years 2000–2002 in the German and French quality press reveals considerable variation in issue salience, actors’ prominence and actors’ responsibility attributions between and within the countries. This variation can be seen to be connected with different policy traditions and conflict constellations. The study seeks to go beyond merely describing variations in media coverage across Europe and systematically uses cross-national and cross-issue comparative research to understand this variation.