Avoiding the Misuse of Pathway Analysis Tools in Environmental Metabolomics.
Avoiding the Misuse of Pathway Analysis Tools in Environmental Metabolomics.
复制标题
避免环境代谢组学中途径分析工具的误用。
DOI:
10.1021/acs.est.2c05588
复制
发表时间:
2022-10-18
影响因子:
11.4
通讯作者:
Ebbels, Timothy M. D.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wieder, Cecilia;Bundy, Jacob G.;Frainay, Clement;Poupin, Nathalie;Rodriguez-Mier, Pablo;Vinson, Florence;Cooke, Juliette;Lai, Rachel P. J.;Jourdan, Fabien;Ebbels, Timothy M. D.
关键词:
Within the past 20 years, metabolomics has moved from an exciting innovation within the environmental sciences to something that is almost routine. It can be considered as a means to generate metabolite biomarkers, although it is also important to note the cogent criticisms of the environmental biomarker approach that have been made within ecotoxicology: briefly, that biomarkers are surrogates for macro phenotypes (eg, survival, reproduction, and behavior) that have population-level effects and that it is generally more straightforward and meaningful to measure these end points directly. 1 Some studies have emphasized instead the ability to gain potentially relevant mechanistic information, even for nonmodel organisms, especially when used as part of a multiomic approach. 2 An improved biological understanding is often implicitly or explicitly part of the justification of including metabolomics in a study.So far, so good, but there is a problem: there is no simple, universally accepted way of reverse engineering mechanistic understanding from metabolomic data, even for model organisms, and the problem is even more complicated for nonmodel species. The closest thing to a standard approach is pathway analysis (PA), ie, making use of existing biochemical knowledge. There are multiple approaches to PA, but we will focus on just one, over-representation analysis (ORA).(NB that the term ORA is often not used, and many authors refer generically to “pathway enrichment” methods.) It should clearly be understood, though, that ORA is certainly not the only approach to analyzing metabolomics data. It is beyond the scope of this work to review the options available, but we direct the interested reader to recent reviews. 3, 4 ORA uses the intuitive approach of identifying metabolite biomarker “hits” and comparing them to the numbers of metabolites in specific pathways, to determine if there are either more or fewer hits than one would expect by chance. It therefore has the twin advantages of being simple to calculate and simple to understand. It does, though, have disadvantages. One potential limitation is shared with all methods that rely on predetermined pathway definitions: traditional pathways are, generally, subjective and heuristic approaches to imposing order on a biochemical network. 5 While this is an important
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Bundy, Jacob G.;Sidhu, Jasmin K.;Rana, Faisal;Spurgeon, David J.;Svendsen, Claus;Wren, Jodie F.;Sturzenbaum, Stephen R.;Morgan, A. John;Kille, Peter
通讯作者:
Kille, Peter
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Forbes, VE;Palmqvist, A;Bach, L
通讯作者:
Bach, L
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Pang Z;Chong J;Zhou G;de Lima Morais DA;Chang L;Barrette M;Gauthier C;Jacques PÉ;Li S;Xia J
通讯作者:
Xia J
影响因子:
3
作者:
Marco-Ramell A;Palau-Rodriguez M;Alay A;Tulipani S;Urpi-Sarda M;Sanchez-Pla A;Andres-Lacueva C
通讯作者:
Andres-Lacueva C
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Wieder C;Frainay C;Poupin N;Rodríguez-Mier P;Vinson F;Cooke J;Lai RP;Bundy JG;Jourdan F;Ebbels T
通讯作者:
Ebbels T