3. Turbulent Combustion
3. Turbulent Combustion
复制标题
3. 湍流燃烧
DOI:
10.1137/1.9781611971064.ch3
复制
发表时间:
1985
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
F. Williams
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Williams
1. Introduction.Like the proverbial elephant, turbulent combustion exhibits so many different aspects that two investigators, chosen at random from the set of all investigators examining the subject, will with high probability disagree entirely about its general characteristics. For example, few will know the full definitions of all of the terms “k-ϵ modelling,” “strange attractor,” “Favre average,” “conserved scalar,” “Kolmogorov scale,” “functional differentiation,” “coherent structure,” “large-eddy Damköhler number,” “random vortex,” “spectral transfer,” “intermittency” and “age theory.” Almost all of the investigators will consider at least one of the items in this sequence to be practically irrelevant to turbulent combustion. Yet, for each of the items there likely exist investigators who would identify that item as the central aspect of the subject. Turbulent combustion has now become so multifaceted that no one has the background necessary to give a complete and impartial review of it. Therefore the reader must prepare himself for an incomplete and somewhat biased review.Fifteen years ago, in the introduction to a review on laminar combustion [1], it was remarked that there had been little progress in the theory of turbulent combustion, and it was predicted that the future rate of progress would not be much greater than that of the immediate past. The truth of that prediction was short-lived (just as with most predictions in turbulent combustion). Research in the subject has mushroomed in-numerous diverse directions in recent years, and a few of the avenues have led fruitfully to genuine discoveries of lasting value. The intent of the present article is to attempt to highlight the most promising avenues and to identify some of the pitfalls along the many seductively ruinous paths.