Who's who at a major incident: standardising role titles for emergency planners

Who's who at a major incident: standardising role titles for emergency planners
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/emj.2005.030098
复制
发表时间:
2006-05-01
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Mackway-Jones, K
Mackway-Jones, K
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mudalige, M;Carley, S;Mackway-Jones, K

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:方法:采用德尔菲法,运用重大事件规划专家对重大事件中关键角色的名称进行命名。专家组确定了28个角色,专家组成员最初为这28个角色提供了184个不同的名称。在一个共同的命名达成协议,只有12/28的角色。结论:有一个标准化的命名重大事故的角色协议。然而,在专家组内部可能难以达成共识。
Objective: To standardise the names for key roles in a major incident.Methods: A Delphi study using experts in major incident planning.Results: There is clear consensus regarding the need for standard nomenclature. The expert group identified 28 roles, and 184 different names were initially given by group members for the 28 roles. Agreement on a common nomenclature was achieved in only 12/28 roles.Conclusion: There is agreement for a standardised nomenclature for major incident roles. However, consensus may be difficult to achieve from within an expert group.