WHICH CLASSES OF STRUCTURES ARE BOTH PSEUDO-ELEMENTARY AND DEFINABLE BY AN INFINITARY SENTENCE?

WHICH CLASSES OF STRUCTURES ARE BOTH PSEUDO-ELEMENTARY AND DEFINABLE BY AN INFINITARY SENTENCE?
复制标题

哪几类结构既是伪基本的又可以用不定式句子定义?

DOI:
10.1017/bsl.2023.1
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
HARRISON-TRAINOR, MATTHEW
HARRISON-TRAINOR, MATTHEW
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
BONEY, WILL;CSIMA, BARBARA F.;DAY, NANCY A.;HARRISON-TRAINOR, MATTHEW

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

当结构类不能一阶定义时,我们仍然可能尝试找到一个很好的描述。有两种常见的方法可以做到这一点。一是扩展语言,导致伪基本类的概念,二是允许无限的合取和析取。在本文中,我们研究交叉点。也就是说,我们解决这个问题:哪些结构类既是伪基本的又是基本的?我们发现这些正是可以由没有无限析取的无限公式定义的类。
When classes of structures are not first-order definable, we might still try to find a nice description. There are two common ways for doing this. One is to expand the language, leading to notions of pseudo-elementary classes, and the other is to allow infinite conjuncts and disjuncts. In this paper we examine the intersection. Namely, we address the question: Which classes of structures are both pseudo-elementary and -elementary? We find that these are exactly the classes that can be defined by an infinitary formula that has no infinitary disjunctions.
很好的无限逻辑
DOI: 10.1090/s0894-0347-2011-00712-1
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
S. Shelah
通讯作者: S. Shelah
DOI: 10.2307/2270256
发表时间: 1971
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
J. Malitz
通讯作者: J. Malitz
DOI: 10.2307/2273064
发表时间: 1973
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
E. López
通讯作者: E. López
使用附加谓词的有限公理化
DOI: 10.2307/2964289
发表时间: 1958
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
W. Craig;R. Vaught
通讯作者: R. Vaught
关系代数游戏
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Hirsch;I. Hodkinson
通讯作者: I. Hodkinson