A LABORATORY TASK FOR INDUCTION OF MOOD STATES
A LABORATORY TASK FOR INDUCTION OF MOOD STATES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4
复制
发表时间：
1968-01-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
VELTEN, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
VELTEN, E
100名女大学生接受了哈佛团体催眠易感性量表A，以提供一种测量初级催眠易感性的方法。在第2个小时，每个S被随机分配到五个单独的治疗，每个20个S。第一组阅读并集中在60个自我指涉的陈述，旨在使人振奋;第二组阅读60个陈述，旨在使人沮丧。第三组阅读60条既不涉及自我也不涉及情绪的陈述。这个小组控制了阅读和实验参与本身的影响。第四组和第五组分别接受了设计为产生模拟抑郁和模拟抑郁的需求特征控制处理，在其他个体处理开始时从每个S获得两个处理前情绪水平的测量值。治疗后，作为标准的焦虑和抑郁症，七个行为任务的措施。其中4例在治疗组中具有显著性差异。三个控制组的学生的比较表现表明，所获得的情绪变化不能归因于人为效应。此外，实验后的问卷调查数据有力地支持了这一结论，即兴奋和抑郁治疗确实分别引起了焦虑和抑郁。
One hundred female college students were administered the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A, to provide a measure of primary suggestibility. In a 2nd hr, each S was randomly assigned to one of five individual treatments of 20 Ss each. One group read and concentrated upon 60 self-referent statements intended to be elating: a second group read 60 statements intended to be depressing. A third group read 60 statements which were neither self-referent nor pertaining to mood. This group controlled for the effects of reading and experimental participation per se. Fourth and fifth groups received demand characteristics control treatments designed to produce simulated elation and simulated depression, respectively.Two measures of pre-treatment mood level were obtained from each S at the beginning other individual treatment. Following treatment, as criteria for elation and depression, seven behavioral task measures were obtained. Four of these distinguished significantly among the treatment groups. The comparative performance of Ss in the three control groups indicated that the obtained mood changes could not be attributed to artifactual effects. Moreover, post-experimental questionnaire data strongly supported the conclusion that Elation and Depression treatments had indeed respectively induced elation and depression.