Factor Structure of the Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile's Professional Issues Scales
Factor Structure of the Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile's Professional Issues Scales
复制标题
DOI：
10.3928/19404921-20091207-98
复制
发表时间：
2010-04-01
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Secic, Michelle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Boltz, Marie;Capezuti, Elizabeth;Secic, Michelle
老年机构评估概况(GIAP)是一项针对医院护士的自我管理调查，旨在评估医院实施老年计划的准备情况。本研究以24家医院2211个直接护理RN为样本，随机分成两半，分别进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析，以分析GIAP的老年专业问题量表。对6个老年专业问题量表(工作人员意见不一致、工作人员/家庭/患者意见不一致、老年服务使用情况、感知到的法律脆弱性、感知到的心烦行为和心烦行为负担)的探索性因素分析表明，无论是整体的内部一致性(Cronbach‘sα系数=0.90)，还是作为个体因素的内部一致性(分别为0.94、0.91、0.92、0.89、0.85和0.81)，都表现出很好的内部一致性。在随机选取的样本中对6个因素进行了验证，拟合指数的均方根误差为0.07，归一化和非归一化的拟合指数均为0.8，均表明六因素模型具有较好的拟合度。
The Geriatric Institutional Assessment Profile (GIAP) is a self-administered survey of hospital nurses, designed to assess a hospital's readiness to implement geriatric programs. A sample of 2,211 direct care RNs in 24 hospitals was randomly split in half to analyze the Geriatric Professional Issues scales of the GIAP, using one sample for exploratory factor analysis and one for confirmatory factor analysis. An exploratory factor analysis of the six Geriatric Professional Issue scales (staff disagreement, staff/family/patient disagreement, use of geriatric services, perceived legal vulnerability, perceived upsetting behaviors, and burden of upsetting behaviors) demonstrated very good internal consistency both as a whole (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.90) and as individual factors (0.94, 0.91, 0.92, 0.89, 0.85, and 0.81, respectively). The six factors were validated in a half randomly selected sample, with a root-mean-square error of approximation fit index of 0.07 and the normed and non-normed fit indices both 0.8, all indicating adequate fit of the six-factor model.