Do categories have politics?
Do categories have politics?
复制标题
类别有政治吗？
DOI：
10.1007/bf00749015
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
L. Suchman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Suchman
根据CSCW社区的著作和最近的社会理论，本文提出，采用言语行为理论作为系统设计的基础，它带有对组织成员行为的纪律和控制的议程。我首先简要回顾一下Winograd， Flores和他们的同事提出的语言/行动视角，特别关注说话者意图的分类。然后，我转向对分类政治的一些观察，并以该框架为背景，考虑通过协调器在组织内实施意图会计的技术系统的尝试。最后，我提出了本文分析对CSCW系统设计的政治意义。
Drawing on writings within the CSCW community and on recent social theory, this paper proposes that the adoption of speech act theory as a foundation for system design carries with it an agenda of discipline and control over organization members' actions. I begin with a brief review of the language/action perspective introduced by Winograd, Flores and their colleagues, focusing in particular on the categorization of speakers' intent. I then turn to some observations on the politics of categorization and, with that framework as back-ground, consider the attempt, throughthe coordinator, to implement a technological system for intention-accounting within organizations. Finally, I suggest the implications of the analysis presented in the paper for the politics of CSCW systems design.