A dynamic, multilevel approach to conceptualising and designing resilience research in the context of military stress.

A dynamic, multilevel approach to conceptualising and designing resilience research in the context of military stress.
复制标题

在军事压力背景下概念化和设计复原力研究的动态、多层次方法。

DOI:
10.1002/smi.3277
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Erbes,ChristopherR
Erbes,ChristopherR
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Polusny,MelissaA;Erbes,ChristopherR

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

弹性概念化的挑战阻碍了弹性科学的进步。作为回应,美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 制定了一个总体框架,用于协调弹性的概念,将其视为由多个系统和分析级别确定的动态过程。与 NIH 复原力框架一致,本文提出了适用于军人的复原力概念模型。该模型包含复原力研究所需的四个核心组成部分:(1)重大挑战的存在,(2)成功适应挑战,(3)复原力能力(即保护性因素),以及(4)保护性因素对个体反应产生积极影响的过程(即机制)。在这个概念模型的指导下,我们概述了推进复原力研究的关键方法建议,并以复原力机制的推进研究作为范例来说明每一项建议。我们强调未来的研究需要将复原力作为一个动态过程进行检验并应用多层次的方法。我们希望为那些有兴趣提高未来军事背景下复原力研究严谨性的人提供一个基本路线图,其结果可以为干预措施的发展提供信息。
Challenges in conceptualising resilience have impeded advancements in resilience science. In response, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed a general framework for harmonising the conceptualisation of resilience as a dynamic process determined by multiple systems and levels of analysis. Consistent with the NIH Resilience Framework, this paper presents a conceptual model of resilience applied to military service members. This model encompasses four core components necessary for resilience research: (1) the presence of significant challenge, (2) successful adaptation in response to the challenge, (3) the capacity for resilience (i.e., protective factors), and (4) the processes (i.e., mechanisms) by which protective factors exert positive effects on an individual's response. Guided by this conceptual model, we outline key methodological recommendations to advance resilience research and illustrate each using the Advancing Research on Mechanisms of Resilience study as an exemplar. We emphasise the need for future research to examine resilience as a dynamic process and apply a multilevel approach. We hope to provide a basic road map to those interested in improving the rigour of future research on resilience in a military context, the results of which can inform the development of interventions.