Diffuse biphasic cutaneous amyloidosis in an HCV‐seropositive patient: another extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection?
Diffuse biphasic cutaneous amyloidosis in an HCV‐seropositive patient: another extrahepatic manifestation of HCV infection?
复制标题
HCV 血清阳性患者的弥漫性双相皮肤淀粉样变性:HCV 感染的另一种肝外表现?
DOI:
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00542.x
复制
发表时间:
2005
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
A. Tuncel
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Z. Erbagci;S. Erkilic;A. Tuncel
The amyloidoses are a large group of protein-misfolding diseases in which a fibrillar protein amyloid is deposited in extracellular tissues and organs. Primary cutaneous amyloidosis (PCA) is classified as macular, papular (lichenoid) and nodular amyloidosis. Coexistence of macular and lichenoid lesions is termed as biphasic amyloidosis (BA). Diffuse BA is very rare and mostly reported from Southeast Asia (1). HCV infection is associated with various extrahepatic manifestations including autoimmune thyroiditis, lymphocytic sialadenitis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, mixed cryoglobulinemia, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, lichen planus and porphyria cutanea tarda (2). No case of HCV in association with PCA has been reported up to date. We present a Caucasian case of widespread BA in association with chronic inactive hepatitis C who responded well to IFN-a. A 75-year-old man presented with a 10-year history of progressive hyperpigmentation, followed by itching and gradual development of numerous firm papules. Examination revealed extensive grey-brown hyperpigmentation sparing oral mucosa, palms and soles and numerous hyperkeratotic papules located mainly on the extensor aspects of extremities, back, abdomen, lumbosacral regions and glutea. The lower extremities were most severely involved by two types of lesions, but the knees were spared. There were depigmented atrophic areas among the lichenoid papules on the anterior aspects of the shins (Figure 1). Remaining findings were normal except congenital kyphoscoliosis. Histological examinations of macular and papular lesions revealed hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, irregular acanthosis, pigment incontinence, superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate and globular homogeneous eosinophilic deposits stained with crystal violet and Congo red in the expanded dermal papillae. Changes were more pronounced in the specimen belonging to a papule. Immunohistochemistry revealed that amyloid deposits reacted with monoclonal antikeratin antibodies like AE1 recognising low molecular keratin peptides K10, 14, 15, 16 and 19. Analyses including biochemical profile, ESR, urine analysis, coagulation tests, serum PTH, T3, T4, TSH, complement and immunoglobulin levels showed normal results. No monoclonal spike was demonstrated by serum protein electrophoresis. Serological investigations revealed that anti-HCV and HCV-RNA were positive, whereas HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc IgM, HIV-1, HIV-2 antibodies, rheumatoid factor, cryoglobulins, and antinuclear, antismooth muscle, antithyroid, anti-liver, anti-kidney and anti-DNA antibodies were negative. Further interview revealed a history of blood transfusion because of a traffic accident 12 years ago. HCV replication could not be detected in lesional skin sections by in situ hybridisation technique. Considering the age of the patient, no specific therapy for inactive HCV infection was planned. The patient was initially treated with oral antihistamines, topical corticosteroids with occlusive covering on the shins without beneficial effects. Systemic UVB therapy thrice weekly for 3 months also yielded no improvement. The patient was then temporarily lost to follow-up. We later saw him again and learned that he had received 3 million units of IFN-a thrice weekly for 6 months in a private clinic. Interestingly, this therapy yielded a significant regression in hyperpigmented macules and his pruritus along with seroconversion of HCV while papular lesions generally persisted. A control biopsy from the back skin showed no amyloid deposits. The pathogenesis of PCA is not well understood. Chronic cutaneous irritation, causing excessive degenerate keratin production with subsequent conversion into amyloid deposits, has been proposed to be an aetiologic factor (3). Amyloid deposits in these types of amyloidosis are thought to be derived from degenerate keratins of apoptotic basal keratinocytes, as they contain sulfhydryl groups and bind to keratin antibodies. Recent immunohistochemical studies showed keratin epitopes with a positive staining of amyloid deposits with antibodies to keratin (4). Various factors may be responsible for keratinocyte degeneration leading to amyloid formation later, including repeated localised mechanical traumas Correspondence to: Dr Zülal Erbagci, Gazimuhtarpasa Bulvari. Gecit 1. No: 1/5, 27090 Gaziantep, Turkey Fax: þ 90 342 3601617 Email: zerbagci@yahoo.com